396 



[ Dec. 19. 



4. The thorax of the figure is incorrect in outline and sculpture, and the 

 tarsi too long, except in fig. 4 d. (See annexed plate, fig. 4.) 

 maliculatua Kby. Westw. p. 5* ; no figure i^ven. 



G. rust,/ it, as Enoch. Westw. p. 59, pi, xiv, fig. 4 ; a fair figure. 



C. Harri&ii, Kby. Westw. p. 59 ; no figure given. 



G. Lecontei Westw. p. 60 note, is our western form of castanem. No fig- 

 ure is given. 



C. WalsMi AVcstw. p. GO note, is the same as retractm Lee. I can 

 hardly determine the priority. The latter name appeared in March, 1874, 

 the " Thesaurus " is simply dated 1874. No figure given. 



G. variolo8US Kby. Westw. p. 60, pi. xiv, fig. 7. The figure is good, 

 except that the sides of the thorax in front of the posterior emargination 

 are much too acutely prolonged. 



C. cicatricosus Westw. p. 60, pi. xiv, fig. 9, is variolosa*, and the figure 

 much Wetter than that above. 



C. squamulosus Lee. Westw. p. 60, pi. xiv, fig 8. From the index to 

 plates this figure belongs to the next. 



G. junior Westw. p. 61, pi. xiv, rig. 8, is squamulosus, and the figure a 

 moderately good one of that species. 



C. Percheronii Westw.p. 61, pi. ii. fig. 5, is variolosus, and the figure a 

 far better one than those above quoted (pi xiv, figs. 7 and 9). 



G. planatus Lee. Westw. p. 62, pi. xiv, fig. 5. The figure is not at all 

 good, the anterior angles of the thorax are represented as double, and the 

 tarsal dilatation not well shown. 



G. depressus Horn. Westw. p. 62. A quotation. 



G. angufarisliec. Westw. p. 63, pi. xiv, fig. 1. This figure seems to be 

 made from specimens collected by J. K. Lord, in Vancouver, which are 

 the types of .Mr. Walker's G. armatus. If the tarsi are correctly figured, 

 then this name should have priority over pilosicollis Horn, which this fig- 

 ure fairly represents. The tarsi are not those of angoliris Lee. West- 

 wood says that this species (armatus) has been received from Japan. 



G. pilosicollis Horn. Westw. p. 63, a quotation. See note above. 



C. nitens Lee. Westw. p. 63, pi. xiv, fig. 2. Westwood appears to 

 quote the description, yet gives a figure without stating its source ; it is, 

 however, not good. 



G. saucius Lee. Westw. p. 64, a quotation. 



G. Knochii Lee. Westw. p. 64, pi. xiv, fig. 6 ; a fair figure. 



G. Schaumii Lee. Westw. p. 64, pi. xiv, fig. 3. The figure is a copy 

 from one drawn by Wagenschieber and sent by Schaum, in which the 

 tarsi and tibise are not well drawn. The body fairly represents the above 

 species, while, as it stands, it more nearly resembles Westwoodi Horn. 



G. craxsipes Westw. p. 204 ; Trans. Ent. Soc. London. 1878, pi. 1, fig. 6. 

 This is the true Scliaumii. I have seen the type. The figure is not a very 

 good one. 



C. crenicollis AVestw. p. 65, pi. ii, fig. 6, is Knochii Lee, and, in 1819, 

 was an undescribed species. The figure is from Schaum by the artisl above 

 named, ami i.^ a better representation of Knochii than that on pi. xiv, fig. Ii. 



