REFERENCES 
Brown, C.A. 1960. Palynological techniques. Baton Rouge, La, 188 
pp. 
Chapman, V.J. 1939. Cambridge University Expedition to Jamaica, 
Jour. Linn, Soc, Bot. 52: 423-445. 
Cuatrecasas, José. 1958. Introduccién al estudio de los manglares. 
Bol. Soc. Bot. Mex. 23: 84-98. 
Czeczott, Hanna. 1960. The flora of the Baltic amber and its age. 
Prace Mus. Ziemi, Nr. 4: 119-145. 
Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angio- 
sperms. Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Mass. 
Faegri, K. and J. Iversen. 196+. Textbook of pollen analysis. Stech- 
ert Hafner, New York. 
Gregory, D.P. 1958. Rhizophoraceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard, 45: 
136-142. 
Guppy, H.B. 1906. Observations of a naturalist in the Pacific. Lon- 
don: 443-449, 
Hammen, TI. van der. 1963. A palynological study on the Quarterna- 
ry of British Guiana. Leidse Geol. Meded. 29: 125-180. 
~—— and T.A. Wymstra. 1964. A palynological study on the Terti- 
ary and Cretaceous of British Guiana. Leidse Geol. Meded. 30: 
183-241. 
Helm, O. 1891. Mittheilungen iiber Bernstein XV, Uber den Suc- 
cinit und die ihm verwandten fossilen Harze. Schrift. d. Naturf. 
Ges. N.F. 7: 189-208. 
Hou, D. 1960. A review of the genus Rhizophora with special refer- 
ence to its occurrence in the Pacific. Blumea 10: 325-334. 
Hurd, P.D. and R.F. Smith. 1957. The meaning of Mexico’s amber. 
Pac. Dis. 10 (2) 1: 6-7. 
—, ——, and J.W. Durham. 1962. The fossiliferous amber of 
Chiapas, Mexico. Ciencia 21 (3): 107-118. 
Johnston, I.M. 1949. The botany of San Jose Island. Sargentia 
VIII: 306 pp. 
Jonker F.P. 1959. The genus Rhizophora in Surinam, Acta Bot. 
Needl. 8: 58-60. 
Langenheim, J.H. 1964, Present status of botanical studies of am- 
bers. Harvard Univ., Bot. Mus. Leaflets 20: 225-287. 
———, 1966. Botanical source of amber from Chiapas, Mexico. Cien- 
cia. 24: 201-211, 
—— and C.W. Beck. 1965. Infrared spectra as a means of deter- 
mining botanical sources of amber. Science 149: 52-55. 
[ 822 ] 
