Hollick, A. 1897. A Cretaceous clay marl exposure at Cliffwood, 
N.J. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Trans., 16: 123-137. 
1905. The occurrence and origin of amber in the eastern 
United States. Am. Nat. 39: 137-145. 
——, 1906. The Cretaceous flora of southern New York and New 
England. U.S. Geol. Surv. Mon. 50: 1-219. 
—-, 1908. Chemical analysis of Cretaceous amber from Kreischer- 
ville (Staten Island, N.Y.). Staten Island Assoc. Arts Sci. Proce. 
2: 34, 
, and E.C. Jeffrey. 1909. Studies of Cretaceous coniferous re- 
mains from Kreischerville, N.Y. New York Bot. Gard. 8: 1-136. 
Hurd, P.D. and R.F. Smith. 1957. The meaning of Mexico’s amber. 
Pac. Dis. 10 (2): 6-7. 
—, ——., and J.W. Durham. 1962. The fossiliferous amber of 
Chiapas, Mexico. Ciencia 21 (3): 107-118. 
Jeffrey, E.C. and M.A. Chrysler. 1906. On Cretaceous Pityoryla. 
Bot. Gaz. 42: 2-15. 
——., 1907. Araucariopitys, a new genus of araucarians. Bot. Gaz. 
442 435-444, 
Johnston, J.F.W. 1838. Guayaquilite, ein neues Mineral organischen 
Ursprungs. J. Prakt. Chemie. 16; 102-104. 
Kimyai, A. 1966. New plant microfossils from the Raritan Forma- 
tion (Cretaceous) in New Jersey. Micropaleo. 12 (4): 461-476. 
Klinger, H. and R. Pitschki. 1884. Uber den Siegburgit. Deut. 
Chem. Ges., Berlin 17: 2742-2746. 
Knowlton, F.H. 1896. American amber-producing tree. Science 3: 
582-584. 
Kunz, G.F. 1883. On a large mass of Cretaceous amber from 
Gloucester Co., New Jersey. Am. Jour. Sci. III, 25: 234. 
——. 1903. Precious stones. Min. Res. of U.S. : 911-975. 
Langenheim, Jean H. 1964. Present status of botanical studies of 
ambers. Harvard Univ. Bot. Mus. Leaflets 20: 225-287. 
—. 1966. A botanical source of amber from Chiapas, Mexico. 
Ciencia XXIV: 201-209. 
——. 1967. Preliminary investigations of Hymenaea Courbaril as a 
resin producer. Jour. Arn, Arb. 48: 203-230. 
—— and C.W. Beck. 1965. Infrared spectra as a means of deter- 
mining botanical source of amber. Science 149: 52-55. 
[ 103 ] 
