137. 
I4l. 
142. 
143. 
144. 
148. 
PérEz DE Barrapas, José. Plantas Magicas Americanas. Madrid: Consejo 
Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas Instituto ‘Bernardino de Sahagtin.’ 
1957. See pp 234, 238, 267. 
. Pixe, Eunice V. Not Alone. Chicago: Moody Press, 1956. See pp 109-IT0. 
_ —-—. “Mazatec sexual impurity and Bible reading.” Practical Anthropology, 
Tarrytown, N. Y. Vol VII, No 2, March-April 1960, pp 49-33. 
’ 
Practical Anthropology, Vol VI, No 4, July-Aug 1959, pp 145-150. 
.———, AND Frorence Cowan. “Mushroom ritual vs Christianity.” 
. ——_—.,, AND SARAH C. GUDSCHINSKY. See Entry 44. 
_ —__—. For letter to R. Gordon Wasson, see Entry 1, pp 242-5, and Entry 
2, pp 47-8. 
These valiant women, who have lived for years among the Mazatecs, have made 
an invaluable contribution to our knowledge of the role of the Sacred Mushrooms 
in the lives of the Indians. R.G.w. 
Punaricu, ANDRA. “The mushroom in myth.” Bull Mycol Soc San Fran- 
cisco. Vol IX, No 12, 1959, pp 3-7. 
For other entries by this author see Entry 98 and sEC VII. R.G.W. 
Ramssottom, JoHN. Mushrooms & Toadstools. London: Collins, 1953. 
See pp 49-SI. 
Ravicz, Rosert. “La Mixteca en el estudio comparativo del hongo 
alucinante.”’ An Inst Nac Antrop Hist, Mexico. Vol 13, 1960 (1961), pp 73-92. 
An anthropological study of the role of the Sacred Mushrooms in one region of 
the Mixetca, based on observations made in 1960 in the company of R. Gordon 
Wasson. R.G.W. 
Rexo, Bras Pasxo. “Delos nombres botanicos Aztecos.” El México Antiguo, 
Vol I, No 5, Feb 1919, pp 113-157. See entry under nanacatl. 
. ———. Letter to J. N. Rose, U. S. National Museum. U. S. National 
Herbarium. Herbarium Sheet No 1745713, Washington, D. C., 1923. 
. ———. Mitobotdanica Zapoteca. Mexico: 1945. See pp 14, 44, 53, 95. 
—.“‘Nombres botanicos Chinantecos.” Boletin de la Sociedad Botanica de 
México, No 8, 1949, pp 9-20; see p 12. See Entry 1, p 238n. 
Reko was the modern precursor of all subsequent workers on the problem of 
the Sacred Mushrooms. An indefatigable field worker, his observations drew little 
attention at the time, but later they were fully recognized and his priority is now 
assured, R.G.W. 
Rexo, Vicror A. Magische Gifte. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1936 (1938, 
1949). See pp 123-132. 
[ 53] 
