776 BULLETIN 50, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. 



l*tige 57: To citations of Tanagra cana add: 



BoicARD, Liste Ois. Guat., 1878, 33. 



Page 58: To citations of Tanagra cana. diaconus add: 



Bangs, Prof. New p:ngl. Zool. Club, iii, 1902, 65 (Boquete, 3,000 to 4,000 ft., and 

 Bogaba, Chiriqui) . 



Page 62: To citations of Tanagra ahhas add: 



BoucAKi), Liste Ois. Guat., 1878, 33. 



Page 62: To synonymy of Spindalls add: 



Shizampelis (typographical error) Bryant, Proc. Bost. Soc. X. H., xi, 1866 (pub. 

 May, 1867), 92. 



Page 77: The sj-nonyniy of Piranga rnhriceps^ accidentally omitted, 

 is as follows: 



P[yron(7»] rnbricejjs Gray, Gen. Birds, ii, 1844, 364, pi. 89, lower tig. (No 

 description nor locality given.) — Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway, Hist. N. 

 Am. Birds, i, 1874, 433j , 



Pyranga ruhriceps Bonaparte, Rev. et Mag. de Zool., iii, 1851, 178; Note sur les 

 Tang., 1851, 29.— Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1855, 156 (Bogota); 1856, 

 125 (nionogr.); Synopsis Av. Tanagr., 1856, 49; Cat. Am. Birds, 1862, 81 

 (Colombia); Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., xi, 1886, 192. — Sclater and Salvin, 

 Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1879, 502 (Antioquia, Colombia). — Taczanowski, 

 Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1880, 115 (n. Peru); Orn. du Perou, ii, 1884, 496.— 

 Taczanowski and Ber.lepsch, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1885, 81 (Bafios, e. 

 Ecuador, 6,200 ft.).— Bryant (W. E.), Auk, iv, 1887, 78 (Dos Pueblos, Santa 

 Barbara Co., California, 1 spec, "about 1871 "). 



[Pyranga] ruhriceps ^^clxtku m\(\ Salvin, Noni. Av. Neotr., 1873, 22. 



Plirangal ruhriceps Ridgway, Man. N. Am. Birds, 1887, 589 (Dos Pueblos, 

 Santa Barbara Co., California; description). 



Pyranga erylhrocepliala (not Spermagra erylJiroccjihala Swainson) Gray, Gen. 

 Birds, App., 1849, 16. 



[Pymnga'} eryiliroccplKda Bonaparte, Consp. Av., i, 1850, 241. 



Pyranga pyrrhoccpltaht " Massena, MS." Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1856, 

 125 (in synonymy). 



This exclusively South American species has been reported (as above 

 cited) to have been once taken in California. The identification of the 

 specimen on which the record is based is undoubtedly correct; but 

 even granting no mistake has been made as to the specimen having 

 actually been taken in California, the occurrence must have been purely 

 fortuitous, most likely an escape from captivity, and the species has no 

 claim to a place in the North American fauna. 



Page 81: To citations of Piranga ruhra add: 



Butler, Bull. Brookville Soc. N. H., no. 2, 1886, 32 (Franklin Co., Indiana, com- 

 mon summer resid.). — Ridgway, Orn. Illinois, i, 1889, 217. — Beyer, Proc. Louis. 

 Soc. Nat. for 1897-99 (1900), 108 (Louisiana, breeding).— Torrky, Auk, xviii, 1901, 

 273 (Newton, Massachusetts, 1 spec. May 12, 1901). 



Page 84: To citations of Piranga ruhra cooperi add: 



Allen, Bull. Am. Mus. N. H., v, 1893, 40 (Fronteras, n. e. Sonora, August; San 

 Diego, n. w. Chihuahua, April, May). 



