REVISION OF THE OECOPHORIDAE — CLARKE 273 



In addition, I have had for determination the following: 1 male 

 from Smnmerland, British Colmnbia (21-VII-1933, A. N. Gartrell) ; 

 4 females from Ottawa (8-VIII-1924, G. S. Walley; lG-VII-1906, 

 C. H. Young) and Blackburn, Ontario (7-VII-1939, E. G. Lester) ; 

 and 1 female from Putnam County, 111. (14-IX-1939, M. O. Glenn). 



Family HELIODINIDAE 



Genus EUCLEMENSIA Grote 



Plate 3, Figure 23 ; Plate 7, Figltee 54 ; Plate 12, Figures 77, 77a ; Plate 15, 



Figure 93 



Eticlemensia Grote, Can. Ent., vol. 10, p. 69, 1878. — Busck, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 

 vol. 35, p. 202, 1908. — Meyrick, in Wytsman, Genera insectorum, fasc. 165, 

 p. 20, 1914. — Forbes, Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Stat., Memoir 68, p. 357, 1923. — 

 MoDuNNOUGH, Check list of the Lepidoptera of Canada and the United States 

 of America (Part 2, Microlepidoptera ) , p. 87, 1939. (Genotype: Hamadnjas 

 iassettella Clemens, Proc. Ent. Soc. Philadelphia, vol. 2, p. 423, 1864.) 



Hamadnjas Clemens, Proc. Ent. Soc. Philadelphia, vol. 2, p. 422, 1864 (preoccu- 

 pied). (Genotype: Eamadryas bassettella Clemens.) 



Head with smoothly appressed scales; antenna slightly rough- 

 scaled, without pecten on basal segment. Labial palpus exceeding 

 base of antenna ; third segment slightly shorter than second. Tongue 

 developed. 



Fore wing narrow, elongate, costa very slightly concave at middle; 

 12 veins ; 7 and 8 stalked, both to costa. 



Hind wing nearly as broad as fore wing, 8 veins ; 6 and 7 subparal- 

 lel ; 3 and 4 separate. 



Male genitalia. — Harpe symmetrical, simple. Anellus with well- 

 developed lateral processes; central plate absent. Gnathos bifid. 

 Uncus absent. 



Female genitalia. — Bursa copulatrix double, partly sclerotized ; in- 

 ception of ductus seminalis on bursa; two ducts. Ostium opening 

 in median portion of genital plate. 



Remarks. — Although this genus does not belong in the Heliodinidae, 

 where both Meyrick and Forbes placed it, I am leaving it there until 

 the family is revised and the genera are reallocated. 



EXPLANATION OF PLATES 



The illustrations for this paper were made by the author ; the plates 

 were composed by Mrs. Eleanor A. Carlin, Bureau of Entomology 

 and Plant Quarantine. No attempt was made to adhere to a definite 

 scale in making the drawings. Most of the male genitalia were 

 drawn to one scale but the female genitalia were drawn to a con- 

 venient size. 



