262 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. vol.42. 



of Mr. and Mrs. T. S. Oldroyd and Mrs. B. L. Baldridge to that 

 of San Pedro, California; and of Mr. S. S. Berry to that of the 

 vicinity of Monterey, CaHfornia. I wish also to express my sincere 

 thanks to Mr. Tom Iredale for calling attention to certain biblio- 

 graphical and other errors occurring in Bulletin 68, which are cor- 

 rected in the present paper. 



The accompanying drawings were made by Miss Evelyn G. Mitchell. 



When the monograph was prepared several publications were not 

 available for consultation, among them the Synopsis of the British 

 Museum for 1840 and 1842, which made it necessary to use secondary 

 quotations, and has led to some slight errors. Another work, by De 

 FoHn, D'une Methode de Classification pour les Coquilles de la 

 famille des Chemnitzidae,^ had escaped our attention altogether and 

 has only recently been made known to us by Mr. Tom Iredale.^ We 

 have been unable to find it in Washington so far, but take Mr. Iredale's 

 assurance in the places cited that the paper we quoted as "Constit. 

 Method, de la Fam. Chemnitzid£e, 1885," reprints the tabular classi- 

 fication without change. Although this makes quite a change neces- 

 sary in the references to De Folin's names, it fortunately entails no 

 change in the nomenclature in use. This second paper of De FoHn 

 we had seen in separate form only, and we are told by Iredale that it 

 was published in 1884-85.^ 



The following notes will bring the bulletin up to date: 



Page 8, line 22: Scacchi should read Brocchi. 



Page 10: Drop the footnote and cite the subgenus as follows: 

 Agatha A. Adams, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 3, vol. 6, 1860, p. 422. 

 Type, Agatha virgo A. Adams. Tliis was a monotypic genus at the 

 time of description, and although the type was subsequently assigned 

 to Myonia, Menestho, and Amathis by A. Adams, must remain as 

 the type of the present group, which is valid. 



Page 11, line 22: plicala should read plicatula. 



Pages 13 and 18: The subgenera Elodiamea De Folin and Odos- 

 tomella Bucquoy, Dautzenberg, and Dollfus should be united, the 

 complete synonymy reading: 



Odostomella Bucquoy, Dautzenberg, and Dollfus, Moll. Roussillon, 

 1883, p. 167, type, Rissoa doliolum Phihppi, + Elodia De Folin, 

 Ann. Soc. Linn. Maine et Loire, vol. 12, 1870, p. 200, = Elodiamea 

 De Folin, Zool. Rec, 1885, published in 1886, p. 94, not Elodia 

 Desvoidy, 1863 + Herviera Melvill and Standen, Journ. Conch., 

 vol. 9, 1899. 



Page 16, line 39: gradata should read graduata. 



Page 17, line 22: 1853 should read 1833. 



1 Ann. Soc. Linn. Maine et Loire, vol. 12, pp. 191 et seq. * 



2 Nautilus, vol. 24, 1910, pp. 55-6. 



3 Ann. Soc. Agr. et Hist. Nat. Lyons, vol. 7, pp. 209 et seq. 



