118 HISTORY OF THE BRIDLED TITMOUSE 



WOLL WEBER'S Titmouse cauie to us with letters of iu- 

 troductiou from three very eminent ornithologists, all 

 written in 1850, and so nearly simultaneously that it is a close 

 question of actual priority. Tiie Prince Boiiaparte named it 

 in honor of Wollweber in the issue of the "Comptes Reudus" 

 dated September, 1850. Mr. Cassin described it as Parus an- 

 nexus in the "Proceedings" of the Philadelphia Academy for 

 October, 1850; and it must have been close upon this date 

 that Dr. Cabanis published a description under the name of 

 ioj>/i02>/i«nc.S'//a?mfMS, adopting the term from Prof.Lichtenstein's 

 museum name, Parus ffaleatus. For, though the whole Tlieil of 

 the "Museum Ileineauum" which treats of the Sinfjvogel is 

 dated 1850-1, it was published in slieets, and not furnished 

 with an introduction until October, 1851, and the name occurs 

 on the second page of the twelfth "signature'-, the fourteenth 

 of which bears date January, 1851. ]S"o one, however, appears 

 to dispute Bonaparte's actual precedence in the matter. Mr. 

 Cassin figured the bird with his description. The following 

 year, 1851, Professor Westermann also gave a figure in the 

 "Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde"; for the third time it was re- 

 figured by Professor Baird, in the Mexican Boundary Survey 

 Report; a fifth illustration is found in 

 Dr. Cooper's work ; a sixth in my " Key " ; 

 and a seventh in the " History of North 

 American Birds". The curious strijiiifg 

 of the head is a specific character which 

 immediately attracts attention, and one 

 well ada[)ted to pictorial illustration. The 

 figure here given, reproduced i'vom the 

 " Key", is a copy (none too good) of the 

 FIG. i9.-Huad of Bridled li^ficl of that in the Mexican Boundary 

 Titmouse. " Report. 



This elegant little species is better known stuffed than alive; 

 the Stiibengelehrten and some of the ^^Bah/kramer'^ (among whom 

 it is whispered the namer of Parus yaleatus is ranked by some) 

 Lave had it pretty much their own way. Yet the remark, mnde 

 by Dr. Brewer in 1874, that "Dr. Kennerly is the only one of 

 our naturalists who has meutioiied meeting the species in its 

 living form", was not strictly correct. For one, I had become 

 familiar with the bird at Fort "\Vhii)ple, Arizona, and had 

 summed my observations in a brief phrase: — "Permanent 

 resident; common, more so at least than the preceding [L. 



