4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. us 



barrettae has line priority, I as first revisior, give mexicana precedence 

 because its hole-type is a male. Although the lectotype of mexicana 

 (Ulmer) is without abdomen, the coloration and original figures of 

 the male genitalia indicate that this too is a synonym. 



Chitnarra (Chimarra) moesta (Banks) 



Figure 16 



Chimarrha (Curgia) moesta Banks, 1924, p. 449. — Betten, 1934, p. 176. 

 Chimarra moesta (Banks). — Fischer, 1961, p. 67. 



The holotype, female, of this Cuban species is shown in figure 16. 



Chimarra (Curgia) persimilis (Banks) 



Figures 11, 12 



Chimarrha persimilis Banks, 1920, p. 360. — Lestage, 1925, p. 37. 

 Chimarra persimilis (Banks). — Fischer, 1961, p. 68. 



Lectotype, male: "Quevedo W. Ecuador," "N. Banks," "Type 

 10907," "Chimarrha persimilis Bks. Type." 

 The lectotype is illustrated in figures 11 and 12. 



Chimarra (Curgia) pulchra (Hagen) 



Figures 8-10 



Chimarrha pulchra Hagen, 1861, p. 298; 1864, p. 809.— Kolbe, 1888, pp. 167, 

 175.— Ulmer, 1905b, p. 69; 1907b, p. 200; 1909, p. 127; 1913, p. 405 — 

 Betten, 1934, p. 176.— Ross 1952, p. 32. 



Chimarrha (Curgia) fraterna Banks, 1924, p. 449. — Betten, 1934, p. 176. [New 

 synonymy.] 



Chimarra pulchra (Hagen). — Fischer, 1961, p. 69. 



Chimarra fraterna (Banks). — Fischer, 1961, p. 60. 



Koss designated the lectotype of pulchra; I designate here the 

 lectotype, male, of fraterna: "Cuba Ch. Wright," "Type 14876." 



The extent of golden hairs on the forewings is somewhat variable. 

 The lectotype of fraterna has the patch somewhat divided; otherwise, 

 it is identical to pulchra. 



A male of this common Cuban species is illustrated in figures 8-10. 



Chimarra (Curgia?) pumila (Banks) 



Figure 17 



Chimarrha pumila Banks, 1920, p. 359. — Lestage, 1925a, p. 37. 

 Chimarra pumila (Banks). — Fischer, 1961, p. 69. 



Lectotype, female: "Quevedo W. Ecuador," "N. Banks," "Type 

 10908," "Chimarrha pumila Bks. Type." 



The female lectotype is illustrated (fig. 17) herein. It is probably 

 the female of C. 'persimilis Banks. 



