BIBLIOGRAPHIC UST OF GENERA AND SPECIES. 75 



ASAPHOIDICHNUS Miller. Genotype: A. trifidus Miller. 



Asaplioidichnus Miller, Jour. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., 2, 1880, pp. 217, 218; 

 N. A. Geol. Pal., 1889, p. 530. 



Asaphoidichnus dyeri Miller. 



Asaplioidichnus dyeri Miller, Jour. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., 2, 1880, p. 219, 



pi. 13, fig. 1.— Nathorst, Kongl. Sven. Vet.-Akad. Handl., 18, No. 7, 1881, 



p. 48. 

 Eden (Economy): Cincinnati, Ohio. 



Asaphoidichnus trifldus Miller. 



Asiiphoidiehnus trifidTis Miller, Jour. Cincinnati Soc, Nat. Hist., 2, 1880, p. 218; 



N. A. Geol. Pal., 1889, p. 530, fig. 966. 

 Eden (Economy): Cincinnati, Ohio. 



ASAPHUS Brongniart. Genotype: Entomolithus paradoxus expansus Linnaeus. 



Asaphus Brongmart, Hist. Nat. Crust. Foss., 1822, p. 17. — DeKay, Annals Lyceum 

 Nal. Hist., New York, 1, 1824, p. ]75 footnote.— Dalman, Kongl. Vet.-Akad. 

 Handl. for 1826, 1827, pp. 149, 235, 268.— Dalman-Engelhart, Die Palaeaden, 

 Nurnberg, 1828, pp. 32, 41.— Eichwald, Zool. Specialis, pt. 2, Vilnae, 1830, 

 p. 114. — Fischer de Waldheim, Oryctographie de Moscou, 1830-1837, p. 121. — 

 Eaton, Geol. Textb.,2d ed., 1832, p. 31.— Green, Mon. Tril. N. A., 1832, pp. 

 16, 43.— Murchi-son, Sil. Syst., 1839, p. 654.— Edwards, Hist. Nat. d. Crus- 

 taces, 3, 1840, p. 305.— Burmeister, Org. der Tril., Berlin, 1843, p. 122.— 

 Portlock, Rep. Geol. Londonderry, 1843, pp. 274, 292. — Goldfuss, Neues 

 Jahrb. f. Min., etc., 1843, pp. 541, 560.— Emmrich, ibid., 1845, p. 41.— 

 Loven, Ofvers, Kongl. Vet.-Akad. Forhandl., 2, 1845, p. 50. — Burmeister, 

 Org. Tril., London, 1846, pp. 105, 108.— Hawle and Corda, Abh. d. k. bohmis- 

 chen GeseU. d. Wiss., 5 (extract), 1847, p. 68, pi. 4, fig. 38.— Salter, Mem. 

 Geol. Surv. United Kingdom, dec. 2, 1849, pi. 5. — ^McCoy, Ann. Mag. Nat. 

 Hist., ser. 2, 4, 1849, p. 399.— Barrande, Neues Jahrb. f. Min., etc., 1850, p. 

 778; Syst. Sil. du. Centre Boheme, 1, 1852, p. 643.— Pictet, Traite de Pal., 

 2d ed., 2, 1854, p. 511.— McCoy, British Pal. Rocks and Foss., 1854, p. 169.— 

 Nieszkowski, Archiv. fiir die Naturk. Liv.-Ehstund Kurl., 1st ser., 1, 1857, 

 p. 545.— Chapman, Canadian Jour., n. s., 8, 1863, p. 28; Expos. Min. and Geol. 

 Canada, 1864, p. 136. — Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. United Kingdom, dec. 11, 

 1864, pi. 3; Mon. Brit. Tril., Pal. Soc. 1866, p. 145.— Woodward, Canadian 

 Nat., n. a., 6, 1871, p. 228.— Miller, Cincinnati Quart. Jour. Sci., 1874, pp. 

 135, 136. — Angelin, Pal. Scandinavica, 3d ed., Holmiae, 1878, p. 51. — Novak, 

 Sitz. d. k. bohm. GeseU. d. Wiss. Math. Naturw. CI. for 1884, 1885, p. 217.— 

 Zittel, Handb. Pal., 2, Munich, 1885, p. 608.— Brogger, BDiang till K. Sven. 

 Vet.-Akad. Handl., 11, No. 3, 1886, pp. 25, 26, 70; Afh. Sveriges Geol. Unders., 

 ser. C, 1886, p. 70.— Woodward, Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc. London, 44, 1888, 

 p. 77.— Clarke, Jour. Morph., 2, 1888, pp. 254, 265.— MiUer, N. A. Geol. Pal., 

 1889, p. 530; Ist App. 1892, p. 704.— Walcott, Geol. Mag., dec. 4, 1, 1894, p. 

 247.— Clarke, Geol. Minnesota, 3, pt. 2, 1894, p. 701.— Koken, Die Leitfos- 

 silien, Leipzig, 1896, p. 26, fig. 16, 1, 2. — Beecher, Amer. Jour. Sci., 4th ser., 

 3, 1897, p. 104, pi. 3, fig. 18.— Schmidt, Mem. I'Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Peters- 

 burg, 8th ser., 6, 1898, pp. 11, 12; 12, 1901, p. 4,— Jaekel, Zeits. d. d. geol. 

 GeseU. , 53, 1901, p. 147.— Lindstrom, Kongl. Sven. Vet.-Akad. Handl., 34, 

 No. 8, 1901, pp. 26, 37.— Cumings, 32d Ann. Rep. Dep. Geol. and Nat. Res. 

 Indiana, 1908, p. 1051.— Grabau and Shimer, N. A. Index Fossils, 2, 1910, 

 p. 290.— ^Raymond, Trans, and Proc. Roy. Soc. Canada, 5, 3d ser.. see. 4, 

 1912, p. 114. 



