PROCEEDINGS OF UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. 107 



4. Wing, 5.50-5.90 ; tail, 2.80-3.50. Varying to bright rufous ; gray pbase like that 



of asio and jloridanus, but the mottling above much coarser, and the nape 

 with a strongly indicated collar of rounded white spots, in pairs, on opposite 

 webs. Red phase much more spotted above than that of asio or jloridanus. 

 Hah., E. Mexico and highlands of Guatemala /?. viaccalli. 



5. Wing, 6.80-6.90 ; tail, 3.90-4.10. Not varying to rufous. General aspect much 



paler than any of the preceding ; above pale ash-gray, or very pale cinnamon- 

 gray, the white of the outer webs of the lateral scapulars very conspicuous, 

 the white spots of the outer webs of the primaries sometimes confluent. 

 Beneath pure white, much more sparsely marked than in asio and other races. 

 Hah., Mountains of Colorado «. maxwellia. 



The characters given above are sufficient to distinguish typical speci- 

 mens of several well-marked geographical forms of Sco^ys asio. It is of 

 course understood that specimens possessing intermediate characters 

 frequently occur ; but it is equally true that a very large majority of the 

 specimens from either one of the regions indicated above are typical of 

 the form characteristic of the locality. 



The Little Owl, Catesby, Carolina, 1, 1731-'48, 7, pi. 7. 

 Koctiia aurita mi)wr, Catesb., /. c. 

 Asio scops caroUnensis, Bkiss., Oru. I, 1760, 497. 

 Le Petit Due de la Caroline, Briss., I. c. 



Strix asio, Linn., S. N. I, 1766, 132 (based on Noctua aurita minor, Catesby, Carol. I, 7. — 

 Asio scops caroUnensis, Briss. I, 497).— Gmel., S. N. I, i, 1788, 287. — LATH.,Ind. 

 Orn. I, 1790, .54; Gen. Hist. 1, 1821,314.— Daud., Tr. Orn. II, 1800, 216.-Siiaw, 

 Gen. Zool. VII, 1809, 229.— Wils., Am. Oru. V, 1812, 83, pi. 42, fig. 1.— Temm., 

 PI. Col. II, 1838, pi. 80 (gray phase).— Bonap., Ann. Lye. N.Y. II, 1826, 36 ; Synop, 

 1828, 36; Isis, 1832, 1139.— Jakd., ed. Wilson, I, 1831, 307.— AuD., Orn. Biog. I, 

 1832, 486 ; V, 1839, 392, pi. 97.— Nutt., Man. 1, 1832, 120.— Buewer, ed. Wilson, 

 1852, 687.— Hobs., Nat. 1855, 165. 



*Scoj)s asio, Bonap., Comp. List, 1838, 6; Consp. I, 1850, 45.— Less., Traitd, I, 1831, 

 107.— Kaup, Contr. Orn. 1852, 112.— Cass., Illustr. B. Cal. Tex. &e. 1854, 

 179; in Baird's B.N.Am. 1858, 51.— Heerm., Pacific R. R. Rep. II, 1855, 3.5.— 

 Strickl., Orn. Syn. I, 1855, 199.— Brewer, N. Am. Ool. 1857, 65.— Baird, 

 Cat. N. Am. B. 1859, no. 49.— ? Schleg., Mus. P.-B. Oti, 1862, 27; Rev. Ace. 

 1873, 9.— Gray, Hand-1. I, 1369, 46.— Cooper, Orn. Cal. I, 1870, 420.— Mayn., 

 Naturalist's Guide, 1870, 131 (Mass.).— Coves, Key, 1872, 202; Check List, 

 1873, 65, no. 318.— B. B. & R., Hist. N. An:. B. Ill, 1874, 49.— Sharpe, Cat. 

 Strig. Brit. Mus. 1875, 114 {Dclatvare ; Toronto} — Ridgw., Bull. Essex Inst. 

 Oct. 1874, 172 {Sacramento, Cal.) ; Orn. 40th Par. 1877, 336, 389, 518, .571 (Sa- 

 cramento and Nevada, Cai.).- D'Hamondv., Ois. Eur. 1876, — {Europe). — 

 Bouc, Cat. Av. 1876, 91. 



Buho asio, Vieill., Ois. Am. Sept. I, 1807, 53, pi. 21.— AuD., Synop. 1839, 29 ; Birds 

 Am. I, 1840, 147, pi. 40.— DeKay, Zool.N. Y. 1844, pi. 12, figs. 25, 26.— Giraud, 

 Birds L. 1. 1844, 28.— Max., J. f. 0. 18.58, 23. 



Otus asio, Stephens, Shaw's Gen. Zool. XIII, ii, 1826, 57.— Sculeg., Fauna Japon. 

 1845, 25. 



Asio asio. Less., Man. Orn. I, 1827, 117. 



Ephialites asio, Gray, Genera B. 1, 1844, 38 ; List B. Brit. Mus. 1844, 96.— Woodh., 

 Sitgreaves's Exp. 1853,62. 



Megascops asio, Kaup, Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. IV, 1859, 228. 



