496 Ora Delmer Foster, 



(3j I Pt. 1 ; 23 Mk.4 ; 14 (Mt. 13 ; 18 f. :=Lk. 8 ; 12f.) 



avaY£Ysvv"/]ij.£vot, oux, sx. cxopoci; 6 CTistpcov \6yov (j-zipzi ff. 

 cpS^apTYJ? . . . Bia Xoyou Toti 0£oO 



Bigg thinks that there is some connection here. But cf. I Cor. 

 4 ; 15, Gal. 3 ; 16, 26, 29, 4 ; 19, etc. There is no reason to think 

 that our author depends upon Mark at this point nor that both draw 

 from a common source. 



(4) I Pt. 2 ; 2 Mk. 10 ; 15 (Mt. 18 ; 2 = Lk. 18 ; 17) 



wc apTiysvvYiTa |3pecpYi to Xoyixbv oc, av [j.y] Bs^YiTat, tyjv (iaciXstav 

 ocBoXov y6i\u £711710 B-YjiraTS, iva sv zoo 0£ou w^ TcatBtov, otj [xy] £icr- 



aUTW aU^YlQ^'^TE £1? C-tOTYJpCaV £}.0>-fl £L? aUTYjV 



Chase notices this parallel but he does not advance it as an argu- 

 ment for literary dependence. Closer resemblances both in thought 

 and phraseology are to be found in the Pauline Epistles. Cf . I Cor. 

 3 ; If., 14 ; 20, Eph. 4 ; 14, etc. 



(5) I Pt. 2 ; 7 Mk. 12 ; 10 (Mt. 21 ; 42 = Lk. 20 ; 12) 

 >>iO'Oc 6v dc7r£Boxi[j.ao-av ol olxo- Xib-ov 6v a7:£Sox{[j.acrav oi oIy.0- 

 Bo[xoijvT£(; oSto? £Y£v-^8-y] £ic X£cpa- Bo[j.OLivT£(;, obToq £Y£vyi9>yi si^ X£- 



Verbal agreement, in this quotation from Ps. 118 ; 22, leads us 

 to suspect that some literary connection exists in this parallel. Yet 

 there is nothing in the contexts which suggests it. Mark also quotes 

 Ps. 118 ; 23, showing that he is probably following the original 

 independently. Our Epistle, as we have seen elsewhere, surely 

 depends upon Rom. 9 ; 33 and Eph. 2 ; 20—22 at this point. Assum- 

 ing that this is a genuine saying of Jesus, as it purports to be, we still 

 have no special reason to conclude that Peter is the common source 

 back of these quotations. 



(6) I Pt. 2 ; 13, 17 Mk. 12 ; 17 (Mt. 22 ; 21 =- Lk. 20 ; 26) 



u7U0TaYYiT£ xaoY) avS'p(07rivYi xzi- toc KaCaapo? a7:6Bo-£ kat'japt xai 



o"£i Bia Tov xuptov £it'£ [iccr^ikzX ICC ToD 0£O!j Toi Hew 

 0)? UTZz^iyoyxi £ix£ 41-^1)^6^1^ 17 



TOV B£6v Cpo[3£T(7Q-£, TOV [jaTl^Ea 

 TIIJ-CCTS 



This parallel is very suggestive, yet it is to be noted that Rom. 

 13 ; 1 is even more suggestive of our Epistle. There is practically 

 nothing in the immediate context in Mark to suggest I Peter, whereas 

 Rom. 12—13 has numerous points of probable connection. Cf. 



