404 



Or a Delmer Foster, 



(11) I Clem. 16 ; 5, 6 I Pt. 2 ; 24, 25 



~M [iMlomi auTOu yi[j.sT? laO'Yjjj.sv. o5 too [j.o)Xo)7ri laQ-Yjire. ■yJte yap 



ixev. Isa. 53 ; 5, 6. 



(12) I Clem. 16 ; 10 I Pt. 2 ; 22 



oTi avoij-iav oux sTroiYjcrsv, ouBs be ajj-apxiav oux sTCOiYjasv ouBs 



s6psQ'Y] Bo^O? £V TO) CTOfJ-a-!, ecu- S'jpsS'Y) B6}^05 £V <7T6[J.aTl aUTOU 



TOO. Isa. 53; 9. ' 



(13) I Clem. 16 ; 14 I Pt. 2 ; 24 



xai auTO? a[j.apTia? xo'XT.cov av- 6? Ta(; a[j,apTta? y;[j.o)v [6[xo)v] au- 

 YJvsyxsv, Isa. 53; 12. toc avr^veyxsv 



Quotations 12—13 show they were not copied directly from I Peter 

 but from the LXX. That these quotations from Isa. 53 follow 

 the LXX rather than our Epistle is no proof that the latter did 

 not suggest their use, especially since Clement did not consider the 

 N. T. writings to be on the same level with the O. T. books. If he 

 were following the thought of I Peter, he would, in that case, still be 

 incUned to refer to the original and in so doing quote at greater 

 length, just as he has done. 16 ; 10 follows I Pt. 2 ; 22 in using 

 supsQ--/] BoXo? instead of BoXov. Though the form used by Clement 

 and our author is found in s c. a.^ Swete rejects it and adopts 

 ^olov instead. The latter reading agrees with the original. 

 (1 ""PI no'ip i<'?],) While this is no proof that Clement was influenced 

 by I Peter it is suggestive. Dependence here is indeed made very 

 probable by the use of the word br.oyp(x[x[j.6c in the immediate 

 context with these quotations. See note on the following parallel. 



(14) I Clem. 16 ; 17 



6 57C0Ypa[j.p.6<; 6 BsBo^ivo? Yiplv 



1 Pt. 2 ; 11 



6|uv 67i:o}^i[j.xavo)v 'jTC0Ypa[x[ji.6v 



Professor Bacon has rightly noted that very probably Clement 

 dipped his pen into our author's ink-well when he wrote " 67coYpa[j.- 

 [xoi of the suffering of Christ". Cf. also 33 ; 8. (Bacon's Intro- 

 duction p. 151.) This word is not found anywhere else in the 

 N. T., and it is indeed significant that St. Peter is mentioned by 

 name in a context where the word is used. Cf. 5 ; 4 and 5 ; 7- 

 This parallel is also strengthened by the occurrence of the word 

 Taxsivocppovsw. See Paral. 22. 



