486 Ora Delmer Foster, 



phraseology is different the thought is very suggestive. The pro- 

 babihties of dependence are heightened by the following parallels. 

 I Pt. 2 ; 22 = Heb. 4 ; 15, Heb. 12 ; 2 = I Pt 3 ; 22, I Pt. 2 ; 

 24a = Heb. 9 ; 28a, Heb. 9 ; 26 = I Pt. 3 ; 18. 



(20) I Pt. 3 ; 16 Heb. 13 ; 18 



Si xaTa^a7.£T(70'£ xairatcr/^uvO'coa'iv -/.cCKSiC, b-zko^xzc, avacrTpscpscTQ'at, 

 oi sTTYipea^ovTs? 6[j.cov ty)v ayaO^Yiv 

 £v XpiCTw avacTpocpi^v 



" These are the only N. T. authors who connect ' the good con- 

 science ' with good habits of hfe. " The phrase sv Xpto--o) suggests 

 that our author is influenced here by Paul, yet the above usage 

 seems to indicate that he also knew Hebrews. Note the parallel 

 usage of avaospsiv and its derivative. 



(21) I Pt. 3 ; 22 Heb. 1 ; 3, 4, 6 



0? £G"Tt,V £V Bs'^ia ©sou TtOpSuQ'Sl? £Xa8'tO'£V sv 'hz\l^ TY]^ [J.£YaXo)(TtJVY](; 



dc oupccvbv uTroTaysvTcov auToJ sv 5^yi>.oT(;, too-outco xpsi-TOJv ysvo- 

 ocyyEXtov xai s^ouaioiv xai Buvdcjj.scov [xsvo? tcov aYY£};0)v 



Cf. 2 ; 9, 12 ; 2. 



Though I Peter may depend upon Paul at this point, the sequense 

 of thought, which is so suggestive of Hebrews, should not be over- 

 looked. Cf. I Pt. 3 ; 20 with Heb. 11 ; 7 and I Pt. 3 ; 21 with Heb. 

 9 ; 24, 10 ; 22. 



(22) I Pt. 4 ; 14 Heb. 11 ; 26, 13 ; 13 



£1 dv£iB{^£G-0'£ SV 6v6[j.a-t Xpt(7To3, -/lyricraijxvo? . . . tov 6ve!,Bi(j[j.ov zoo 

 [xaxapiot XpicTTToO, 13 ; 13 tov dvsiSiTjj.ov 



auTou (p£pov-£? 



" These writers only refer to the blessing pronounced by the 

 ninth beatitude on those who suffer reproach for Christ's sake." 

 Our author may draw independently from a logion of the Lord, but 

 it seems quite natural in this context to suppose that he was influenced 

 by Hebrews. 



(23) I Pt. 4 ; 17 Heb. 10 ; 21 



^Tzb -oD oTxou zoo 0£otj STci Tov oTxov zoo (dtoo 



I Peter may be influenced directly by Ez. 9 ; 6, yet the phrase 

 is different. No other N. T. writers use the phrase with the meaning 



