First Epistle of Peter. 493 



(2) I Pt. 1 ; 10 Mt. 13 ; 17 = Lk. 10 ; 24 



TTspi r^c (joy—r^pi'xc scs^YjTYio-av xai ■koXKoI TupocpYJTai [xai (jaa-tlsTc] 



oOx st^av 



This is indeed a suggestive parallel. If there is any literary 

 dependence it must be on the side of our author, as " Q " surely 

 antedates our Epistle some decades. But the thought is not close 

 enough to make this probable. Cf. Eph. 3 ; 3 f . Col. 1 ; 25, Rom. 

 16 ; 25, Eph. 1 ; 9, etc. 



(31 I Pt 1 ; 17 Mt. 6 ; 9 = Lk. 11 ; 2 



Tua^sp . . . 



Harnack, in his " Sayings of Jesus" p. 134, does not place the 

 bracketed phrase in the " Q " source, as A. Huck seems to do in 

 his " Synopse der drei ersten Evangelien " s. 28. At all events, 

 this parallel has no evidential value in the solution of our problem, 

 though Bigg, Chase and Holtzmann point it out. 



(4) I Pt. 3 ; 9 Mt. 5 ; 39 = Lk. 6 ; 29 



[j.Y] a;:oBiB6vT£c xaxov avTi xaxou "Oaxt? cs py.iziZ.ti zli; ty]v [Bs^tav], 

 •?] }.otBopiav avTi loiBopiac tou- G^^ocyova. [aou], >7'i^i'\>oy cc'j-m xal 

 vavTiov Bs suVjyotJV-sc. Cf. 3 ; 16. tyiv aXkri-v. 



Cf. Mt. 5 ; 44 = Lk. 6 ; 28. 



The doctrine of " nonresistance " is clearly set forth in both 

 instances, but the words in which it is couched are very 'different 

 and not at all suggestive either of dependence or of a common source. 

 A close parallel appears in the Markan source, i. e. 15 ; 29. The 

 doctrine here taught is not wholly new in the N. T., e. g. Prov. 17 ; 

 13, 20 ; 22, 24 ; 29, etc. As we have seen elsewhere I Peter most 

 certainly depends upon Rom. 12, so we need not go back of Paul for 

 the doctrine taught in I Pt. 3 ; 9. See Rom. 12 ; 17, 19, I Thes. 5 ; 15, 

 I Cor. 6 ; 7, etc. Though Chase, Bigg, Holtzmann, Monnier and 

 others have pointed out the above parallel it does not so much as 

 prove a common source. 



(5) I Pt. 3 ; 20 Mt. 24 ; 37, 38 = Lk. 17 ; 26 

 TTOu 0£oO p.axpoQ'Uijia £v -/iijipai? &Gr,zp cd "rjijipai, zoo N(o£ 

 Ncos 



Though the reference to zcac, ri^ipMt; Nws suggests some literary 

 connection, it will be observed that the phrase occurs in contexts 



