448 Ora Delnier Foster, 



(12) I Pt. 2; 18 Eph. 6; 5 



01 olni-oa 67coxa(7'70[j.£voi Iv xavTi &[ BoSXot, ^Tiaxous-o toT? xupiot? 

 cpd[3o) ToTc BscTUOTai? . . , [xzxof. (^ol^ou 



On uTZOTrayaTs f. of 2 ; 13, Dr. Hort comments as follows : "In 

 Ephesians (5 ; 21-24, 6 ; 1-3, 5-8) subjection (uTO-ao-cso-O-ai) is set 

 forth only in so far as it concerns family and household relations, 

 the subject of 2 ; 18-3 ; 7 here, but apparently as founded on a 

 general principle of subjection (67:oT-aa-c70[j,£voi oOCkr^'koic, Iv (po(3w 

 XpiGTOu), laid down at the outset in 5 ; 21, which likewise corre- 

 sponds in drift to I Pt. 5 ; 5 as well as to this verse. (Ep. of Pt. 

 p. 139). 



(13) I Pt. 3 ; 1 Eph 5 ; 22 

 yuvaTxsc !j7tO-ao-(70[j.£v&i sv TiavTi cd yuvaTxs^, -zoic, ibioiq avBpao-iv 

 cpopw -oig B£(7;iOTai5 UTTOTradcrso'O'S 



(14) I Pt. 3 ; 6 Epli. 5 ; 22b, 33 



wc ^appa tJTUYj'xouTs to) 'A|3p(xa^., 6iq Toi xupio) (oTt avr^p sctiv xscp- 

 xuptov au'Tov xaXotjira aT^r, t^^ yuvatxoi; . . .) 33 y] yuvrj 



I'va (po[3^Tai t6v avBpa 



(15) I Pt. 3 ; 7 Eph. 5 ; 25 



01 avBps? . . . Tco yuvaixsuo axo- ol avBps?, ayaT^ocTs tocc yuvaTxa? 

 v£[j.ov-£c ^t[r/]v £atj-a)V 



Robinson, in commenting on Eph. 5 ; 33 b, claims " there is here 

 a double reference to this passage in I Pt. 3'; 1—6, which clearly 

 is not independent of Ephesians : 'OiJ^oiox; yuvaTx£? !j;vo-ao-(7o'[X£vat 

 'ZOIC, ibioii; avBpao"iv . . . Tvjv sv cpo'[3w ayvTjV avaT'cpoyYiv uixcov ; and 

 then as if to guard against a false conception of fear, [xtJ cpo[3ou[j.£vai 

 [XY]B£[j.iav x-o'tqo-iv." (Com. on Eph. p. 209). The general trend of 

 the thought as well as the sequence in the last four parallels make 

 dependence very probable. When taken separately these citations 

 do not merit this classification. 



(16) I Pt. 3; 8 Eph. 4; 32 



TO Be -ziXoc tzolv-zc 6[j.6(ppov£c, yiv£(78-£ Be zlc ocXkr\Xoo(; ypriuzoi 

 c7U[j.7ca8'£Tc, cpiXaB£};(pot, Euo-^rXay- £5(7-Xay/^voi,,/_api,^6[X£voi£a'j"7oT?. . . 

 yyoi . . . 



This form of exhortation is common in the Pauline literature. 

 Cf. Rom. 12 ; 13-17, I Cor. 4 ; 12, I Thes. 5 ; 15. But since the 

 passage, which contains a word {zufjzkccyyyoi) not found elsewhere 

 in the N. T., follows immediately after a context suggestive of Ephe- 

 sians, dependence is made very probable. 



