464 



Ora Delmer Foster, 



(6) 



I Pt. 



13 



Bta Tov xupiov sI'tc (BaOTlsT . . . 



SITE YlY£[J.6(7t,V . . , 



Tit. 3 ; 1 



uxopi[xvTj(jx£ a'jTOUc a^ycac, xai 

 ££ouo-iat<; UT^O'uaa-'jEaQ'ai ::£iO-ap/^£Tv, 

 Tcpo? TCocv Ipyov aya&'ov £To{[j.oui; 

 sTvai 



See Rom. 13 ; 1 for equally close thought and better context 



(7) 



I Pt. 2 ; 13 



Tit. 2; 9 



01 TO [XYjXETl avQ-pCOTlWV £TCt8'U[J.tai^ Bo6Xo!j? 



See Eph. 6 ; 5. It is important, however, to note here the possible I 

 reference to I Pt. 2 ; 12 in Tit. 2 ; 8. 



(8) I Pt. 3 ; 1 Tit. 2 ; 5 



yuvaTxs? uTCOTao-o-oiJ-Evai toTc iStotc 'JTroTaTcro^xsva^ toT? iBioi? avBpao't.v 

 avBpaaiv 



An equally tlose parallel is seen in Eph. 5 ; 22, yet the sequence 

 here is suggestive. 



(9) I Pt. 3 ; 3 - 4 Tit. 2 ; B 



Sv SO-TO) ryjy 6 £'|0)&-£V . . . OiXhl 6 Zp£(7(j!JTI,SaC 0J(7a:iT0)C Iv XaTa-TTY,- 



xpuTCTOi; T-^i; xapBia? avb-pcoT^oc . . . [xaTt Iz^otz^ztzSlc . . . 



Cf. I Tim. 2 ; 9 and Rom. 2 ; 29. 



(10) 



I Pt. 3 ; 21 



Tit. 3 : 5 



Biso-wO-Yjcrav Bi uBaTO? 6 xal u[j.a; lo-wo-sv Y][xac, Bia Xo'jTpoLi ■jzccJ.iyyt- 



avTiTUTiov vOv o-o'i^Ei (3a7CTi,i7[j.a, o'j vzfjifxc, xai avaxatvoWscoc xv£'J[j.aT0? 



o-apxoi; ax6Q'£(n? puxou oiWcf. a-'jv£i- ^yiou 

 B'^'7£(0i; ayaS-'^i; £7:£po)Ty)[j-a 



The thought is much the same though the wording is very dif- 

 ferent. Eph. 5 ; 26 is also a close parallel. The context is more in 

 harmony with Romans and Ephesians, yet parallels 1, 6, and 12 

 suggest dependence. 



