430 Ora Delmer Foster, 



false light." Cf. Holtzmann's Com. p. 137, also Gunkel, Abschnitt 

 3, p. 43. Regarding this and its relation to Romans the latter 

 says it is " Ein Zusatz, begriindet ganz in paulinischer Weise." 



(18) I Pt. 2; 14 Rom. 13; 3 



sTcaivov Bs ayaQ^OTTOtcov to ayaQ^ov xotsi, xai z^zic. lizccivov 



Dependence may quite easily be inferred here. ET^aivoc is only 

 used by these two authors in all the N. T. Our author combines 

 in his characteristic fashion the adjective and the verb. Out of the 

 sixty-one words peculiar to I Peter forty-one are compounds. 

 With this tendency of his in mind we can see a perfect parallel here. 

 The closeness of the last three parallels, both in thought and textual 

 sequence make a strong case for dependence. 



(19) I Pt. 2; 24 Rom. 6; 2, 11. 



I'va -zcac a[j.api;i!ai? a7iOY£v6[j.svot oltive? a7i;£d>avo[j.£v ty] a[j,apTia. 



-^^ ZlKMOG'JVJi ^7](7C0[J,£V TlOiC, £Tt ^TjcOp-SV SV aUTY]. 11 



xobc, vsxpou? [J.SV eTvai t^ a[xap'irta, 

 ^wvTa? Ss Tco Gsw. Cf. 6 ; 18. 



" This passage implies the writer's dependence upon the PauUne 

 thought and phraseology." Cone Com. p. 312. Cf. Monnier Com. 

 p. 136. The figure is too thoroughly Pauhne for us to say with 

 Bigg that " the Pauhne images of death or burial with Christ do 

 not cross the author's mind." (I.C.C. p. 148.) 



(20) I Pt. 3 ; 4 Rom. 2 ; 16 



6 xpu7:T6? T-?]$ xapBiac avQ^pcoTTO? al)' 6 sv tw xpuTiTw TouBoTo?, 



xod TiepiTOfiY) xapBia? sv TCV£[j[j.aTrt. 

 Cf. Rom. 7 ; 22 and II Cor. 4 ; 16. 



An exact parallel to Paul's " inward man." Cf. Rom. 7 ; 22. 

 Combining this parallel with I Pt. 2 ; 11 = Rom. 7 ; 23, they both 

 receive added significance. 



(21) I Pt. 3 ; 8 Rom. 12 ; 16 



TO Bs 'zfkoi; xavTs? 6[j.6<ppov£? to auTO dc, ofXkrikooq cppovoOvTsc 



15 ; 5, BcoY] 6[xTv to auTO cppovsTv 

 sv oiXh]koi<; 



(22) I. Pt. 3; 8 Rom. 12; 5 

 <7U[j.7:aQ>£T? yaipstv [xstoc /_atp6vT0)v, xlai£v 



XSTOC xXaiOVTCOV 



