434 Ora Delmer Foster, 



here regarding the connection is better than concerning the order 

 of dependence, thinks the " Pauhne mysticism, regarding the effi- 

 cacy of Christ's sufferings, is borrowed from this passage in I Peter." 

 (" Der Petrinische Lehrbegriff " p. 289.) 



(35) I Pt. 4; 7 Rom. 13; 11, 12 



TravTojv TO tsXoc TJYyixsv vOv syYUTspov yi[j,wv y] cro)TY]pia . . 



Y) vu^ xpO£XO']jsv, 'r\ Bs Y][jipoc 

 YJYYWsv 



That these scriptures are followed by similar exhortations based 

 upon them and that they occur in such close contextual connection 

 with I Pt. 4 ; 3 == Rom. 13 ; 13, is a strong argument for literary 

 dependence. Cf. Weiss' Lehrbegriff p. 420. 



(36) I Pt. 1 ; 2 Ron. 8 ; 29, 11 ; 2, 1 ; 7 



■/va-a TrpoYvtoo-iv WsoO ouc, TcposY^w 11 ; 2, tov Xaov . . 



6v TcposY^w 1 ; 7 xapi? u[uv xal 



£lp"/]VYl 



npoYvcoo-i? and xpoYivcocy.to are strictly Pauline and Petrine 

 terms. The former is found only in I Pt. 1 ; 2 and Acts 2 ; 23. 

 The latter in Acts 26 ; 5, Rom. 8 ; 29, 11 ; 2, I Pt. 1 ; 20, II Pt. 

 3 ; 17. Though I Peter shows a more extended likeness in the 

 fore part to "Ephesians" than to "Romans", it is quite probable 

 that our author was influenced just at this point by the latter, 

 for the former uses xpoopiaac. On the whole it is to be noted that 

 " The salutation of I Peter is formed in an independent manner 

 after the model which had been created by St. Paul, especially as 

 it appears in his Epistles to the Galatians and Romans". Hort's 

 " First Epistle of St. Peter," p. 13. We should also add the Epistle 

 to the Ephesians. 



(37) I Pt. 1 ; 9 Rom. 6 ; 22 



xo[j.t,K6[j.£vot, TO 'zi'krjc T'^^ mTTeo)^ s/s'^s '^ov xapTuov u[j.wv zlc, 6(.yio(.a- 

 (7coTr,ptav 'jiu/wv ^.ov, to Bs tsXo; ^ojtiV auoviov 



Nowhere is this thought more closely duplicated. 



