CATALOCJUK OF NOCTFID.K SMITH. 213 



I have not seen tlie type and do not know where it is. Mr. (Irotc 

 lias suggested that it may be the southern form of the preceding, but 

 later lists it as a good species. I am not in a position to decide the 

 matter and leave it as Mr. Grote did. 



Genus TRILEUCA Grt. 

 1883. Grt., Proc. Am. Phil. Soc, xxi, 166. 



T. biixea Grt. 



1882. Grt., Can. Ent., xiii, 230, Schinia. 



1882. Grt., Papilio, ii, 64, pi. i, f. 4, Schinia. 



1883. Grt., Proc. Am.Pliil. Soc, xxi, 166, Trileuca. 



Habitat. — Southwestern Texas. 



Tlie type is in Mr. IsTeumoegen's collection. 



T. dentalis Smith. 

 1891. Smith, Trans. Am. Ent. Soc, xviii, 123, Trileuca. 



Habitat. — Southern Texas. 



The type is in Mr. Neumoigen's collection. 



T. gulnare Strk. 



1878. Strk., Proc. Dav. Ac. Sci., n, 274, pi. ix, f. 1, ScMnia. 

 1883. Smith, Trans. Am. Ent. Soc, X, 252, Schinia. 

 1883. Grt., Proc Am. Phil. Soc, xxi, 153, Trileuca. 



Habitat. — Pennsylvania; Illinois. 



The type is with Mr. Strecker. I have seen one other specimen. It 

 may not be congeneric with the others referred here, but it is nearer 

 right tliau Avith Schinia. Strictly, rcetifascia is the type of TrileHca, 

 because huxea was placed in Xanfhodes on p. 153, and is only incidentally 

 referred to Trileuca on ]). 1G6; hnt red if ascia is an Atethmia, and the 

 genus, as based on that species, of course, a synonym. Mr. Grote did 

 not see proof of this paper in the Proc. Am. Phil. Soc, which is full of 

 typographical and other errors, else he would have seen the contradic- 

 tion, and it is in accordance with "the usual comity and practice " that 

 I retain the name with huxea as type. 



Genus ATETHMIA Hbn. 

 1816. Hbn., Y.Tzoichniss, 238. 



A. subusta Hlni.* 



1818. Hbn., Zutra?ge, ii, 205, 206, Aiethmia. 

 181G. Hbn., Yerzcichniss, 2.38, Atcthmia. 

 1852. Gu., Spec. Gen., Noct., li, 13, Aiethmia. 

 1856. Wlk., C. B. Mus., Het., X, 490, Aiethmia. 



Habitat. — Florida; Texas; Central and South America 

 Mr. Druce says, in the Biol. Cent. Am., Het. 200, that AntJwphila 

 erecta Wlk., Poaphila congcsta Wlk., and Laphygnia trilineata Wlk., are 

 all the same as suhusta Hbn., and he is probably right. 



