MAMMALS OF NORTHERN COLOMBIA — HERSHKOVITZ 453 



recorded (op. cit., p. 16) from "Mexico, Arizona, California, and 

 Iowa," as well as from the other localities he listed. 



EUMOPS ABRASUS MILLERI Allen 



Promops millen Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 13, p. 92, 1900. 

 Eumops abrasus millen, Sanborn, Ann. Carnegie Mus., vol. 21, p. 182, 1932 

 (Don Diego). — Sanborn, Journ. Mamm., vol. 13, p. 352, 1932 (Don Diego; 

 revision). 



Type locality. — Guayabamba (=Santa Rosa de Huayabamba), 

 San Martin, Peru. 



Specimens collected. — Three. Norosi, BoKvar, 3 females. 



Measurements. — Head and body, 80, 82, 78; tail, 46, 46, 48; hind 

 foot, 13, 13, 14; ear, 22, 22, 22; forearm, 57.2, 59.4, 60.6; greatest 

 length of skull, -, 24.6, 23.6; condylobasal length, -, 22.4, 22.6; interor- 

 bital constriction, 4.6, 4.4, 4.3; width of brain case, -, 10.8, 10.7; 

 upper tooth row (I - ]\P), 10.1, 10.6, 9.8; distance across canines, 

 6.0, 6.0, 5.5; distance across third upper molars. 9.7, 9.6, 9.4. 



EUMOPS GLAUCINUS Wagner 



Dysopes glaucinus Wagner, Wiegmann's Arch. Naturg., Jahrg. 9, vol. 1, p. 



368, 1843. 

 Promops glaucinus, Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 20, p. 457, 1904 



(Santa Marta). 

 Eumops glaucinus, Sanborn, Journ. Mamm., vol. 13, p. 353, 1932 (Santa Marta; 



revision). 

 Type locality. — Cuyabd, Matto Grosso, Brazil. 



MOLOSSUS MAJOR MAJOR Kerr 



V[espertilio] Mol[ossus] major Kerr, Animal Kingdom, p. 97, 1792. 



Molossus major, Miller, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 46, pp. 85-86, 90, 1913 



(Dominica, Trinidad, Venezuela). 

 [?] Molossus crassicaudatus, Sanborn {nee Geoffroy), Ann. Carnegie Mus., vol. 



21, p. 183, 1932 (Jaraquiel; El Tambor, Santander). 



Type locality. — La Martinique, Lesser Antilles, West Indies. 



Specimens collected. — Eight. Aguas Blancas, near Valencia, 2 males, 

 6 females (1 in alcohol). 



Measurements.— Head and body, 58-63; tail, 36-40; hind foot, 

 9-11 ; ear, 9-14; forearm, 36.8-38.7; greatest length of skull, 16.4-17.8; 

 zygomatic breadth, 9.6-10.6; width of brain case, 8.7-8.8; maxillary 

 tooth row (C-M^), 6.0-6.4; distance across upper canines, 4.2-4.6. 



Remarks. — In his revision of the genus Molossus, Miller (op. cit.) 

 found it expedient to treat as separate species all named forms 

 recognizably distinct. These were arranged into species groups 

 according to size. The rufus group included the large members of 

 the genus with greatest breadth across the upper canines 5 mm. or 

 more. The smaller species, with greatest breadth across the canines 

 less than 5 mm., were subdivided into the currentium, the pygmaeus, 



