I liS I. OKI) W M.srVCII AM 



I have also ivi ■ i'Mirnih examples Walker's "'enem Zarum 



I i barn, and ..Wi all nearly I forms. 



Welder and Kogen holer i Novara, pi. exxxix. tig. '■'>■> i, adopt. I think 

 : good reason, i ius Acrofojihus for what is evidently a species 



congeneric with Anapyhora plumifrontcUa < 



I'ocy, in the 'Cent-uric do Lepidop! I ile do Cuba,' is:;_'. clearly 



•actorizos that genus, and admits thai his species is evidentl\ eon 



rie with I'inarh hainiferella liiibner, Ziitr. 111,4-12. lie would 



ve adopted I Kilmer's generic name, had il been founded on the 



palpi instead of on Ihe colors of (he insect : bul he adds "on peul voir 



par son Catalogue (1 upteres connus, que la plupart de scs I'inaiis 



onl les palpes courts et de la forme ordinaire." 



Mr. Grote has somewhere suggested I I have not the reference before 

 me), thai Avro/ojjhu* should probably be substituted for Aunphura 

 I n i his 1 cut irely concur. 



Tls. AcrolophuM ? sp. 



Named in Miss'Murtfeldt's list. "Anaphora mortipennella Grote.' 

 It is larger than G rote's measuremenl and seems to be pale oehroous 

 rather than "dirty whitish." I am not convinced that it is (rub 

 .1 nwrti'jicmir/la, and should be glad to be reassured as to this. It 

 presents a curious superficial reseni] in ■ i AmyJrla cffrennteUa Clem., 

 in color and markings, but differs in the - of the palpi and in 



the darker hind wings, broader lure wings, A.<\ 



It differs also in the form of the wings from all Clemens's species of 

 the genus Anaphora, and ha- the appearance of a connecting generic link 

 Anaphora and Amjjdria. The neuratioii. however, differs from 

 tint (if both these genera in the furcation of the apical vein. 



280-265. AerolopliUS ? siinulaliis. sp. nov.— Head maxillary 



palpi none ; tongui non oci I li u :. Labia,] palpi recurved I .1 ami 



n ■■ i ong, ro i 1 1 y t ,,.... 



long as tin i \ it\ 



■','■■ 

 somcv ■ on both sides, i i ' append 



age 'i I he in. ill- much de\ i 



ill In- uppe ■ shield .which i, the 



l.y convex, the dorsal 

 mewhat con ,-. Kind 



. wider than i he rate veins. 



Tin- \.-in from the upper corner discal on the 



costal cell of hind win rown 



ami whitish ochrcous patch' i I dorsal halves of I he fore w . 



the paler portions apparently predominatin I ian in EulepisU cfcn 



som\ the darker portions assuming the form of. two iiiguhi there an 



