182 LORD WALSINGHAJT. 



Four specimens from Mr. CoquUlet. No locality given. 



A beautiful species, allied to G. agrimovietta, Clem., which is also 

 represented in this collection, but differing from it in the three contigu- 

 ous white streaks from the apical margin. 



331. Geleehia (— ?J altribntella. 



Gelerhia attribittella, Walk. Cat. Lep. Het. B. M. xxix. p. 593. 



Evagora difficult sell a. Chambers, Can. Ent. iv. p. (ill. 



Tai/gete difficilisella, Chambers, Can. En(. v. p. 231, vii. p. 105, viii. p. 19. 



Geleehia diffieili.se/la, Chambers, Can. Ent. iv. p. 192, v. pp. L85, 1st!, 187. 229, 

 and Index. 



Comparing these specimens with one in the collection of the Peabody 

 Academy of Sciences, Salem, Mass., received from Mr. Chambers, and 

 with Walker's type of G. attribittella in the British Museum, I find them 

 to be the same. Walker's name has precedence. 



148-150. Geleehia (F.vagurai apicif ripuiictella. 



Evagora apicitripunetellu, Clem. Proc. Ac. Nat. Sci. Phil. I860, p. 165. 

 Geleehia (Teleia?) gi/viscopel/a, Zell. Verh. z.-b. Ges. Wien, 1873. p. 266. 

 Geleehia gileiscopella, Cham., " Index." 



These are pale varieties of a species which I carefully compared in 

 1872 with the remains of Clemens's type of Evagora apicitripwnctella , 

 in the collection of the Entomological Soc at Philadelphia. They do 

 not entirely agree with his description, but this may probably be owing 

 to their slightly worn condition. '1 hey agree as nearly with Zeller's 

 description of Geleehia (Teleia?) gilviscopeRa ; and although it seems 

 somewhat remarkable that Dr. Clemens should have overlooked the tuft 

 of hairs on the hind wings, I am convinced that a comparison of this 

 species with his type of Evagora will show them to be the same. In 

 Prof. Riley's collection is a dark specimen with a more decidedly yellow 

 brush on the hind wing; it agrees with Zeller's figure of his G. dorsi- 

 vittella. They may very probably be specifically distinct, although an 

 intermediate variety in the collection of the Peabody Academy of Sci- 

 ences, received from Mr. Chambers under the name of Geleehia. crista- 

 tella, Cham., points to the possibility that these may be three varieties 

 one species. I have at least two undescribed brush-bearing species from 

 California and Oregon, in which I observe that the brush is much less 

 developed in the female sex than in the male, although it cannot be said 

 to be entirely absent from good specimens. In females which are much 

 worn it cannot be detected. Dr. Clemens's type was probably a female. 



93, 94, 95. Geleehia (Tachyptilia) rhoifrnclella. 



Geleehia (Tachi/ptilia) rhoifrnclella, Clemens, Proc. Nat. Sci. Phil. I860, p. 163; 

 Tin. Nor. Am. p. 114, &c. 



Geleehia oehreocostel/a, Chambers, Bull. U. S. G. & G. Surv. 1878, iv. p. 91. 

 ? Geleehia {Tachyptilia) consone/la, Zell. Verh. z.-b. Ges. Wien, 1873, p. 251. 



