KEPT] LI A. 295 



more or less than Cope's A. oligaspis. A comparison of Rosen's poor figure 

 (Lunds univ. arrskrift, 1911, 7, no. 5, p. 30, pi. 1 — , fig. 8) with Cope's makes it 

 appear as certain as possible under the circumstances that this species is an ex- 

 tremely rare one which occurs very sparingly on New Providence, whence the 

 type came, and Andros Island, whence Rosen brought two specimens. These 

 he confused with A. porcaius, which, in the Bahamas, should be called A. brun- 



neus. 



Anolis leucophaeus G arm an. 



Garman, Bull. Essex inst., 188S, 20, p. 109. 



This species, of which the type (M. C. Z., No. 6,226) comes from Great 

 Inagua, is by common consent considered the same as Cope's A. cinnamomeus 

 (Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phila., 1894, p. 435); and there seems to be no reason for 

 not including his A. nioorei also in the synonymy {loc. cit., p. 433). 



Anolis chlorocyanus Dumeril et Bibron. 

 DuM^RiL et Bibron, Erpet. gen., 1837, 4, p. 117. Boulenger, Cat. lizards Brit, nius., 1885, 2, p. 44. 



Garman (Bull. Essex inst., 1887, 19, p. 24) retained this species as distinct 

 from A. coelestinus Cope (Proc. Acad. nat. sci. Phila., 1862, p. 177). An exami- 

 nation of his material, which consisted of two fine adults from Samana, San 

 Domingo, the types of A. coelestinus (M. C. Z., No. 2,347), and three others which 

 he collected at Tiburon, Haiti, forces the conclusion that these are really one and 

 the same species, although it must be confessed that the head scales indicate 

 that the specimens fall into two classes. There are, however, intermediates, 

 and for this reason I do not feel justified in keeping the species distinct. Bou- 

 lenger had already combined them. The form occurs upon Haiti only. Mr. 

 Mann collected one example at Diquini, Haiti. 



Anolis pulchellus Dumeril et Bibron. 



DuMERiL et Bibron, Erpet. gen., 1837, 4, p. 97. Stejneger, Kept. U. S. nat. mu.s. for 1902, 1904, p. 

 660, fig. 112-116. ■ 



Stejneger has shown that this .species does not really come from Martinique, 

 the type locality mentioned by Dumeril and Bibron, since P16e, who sent the 

 specimens to the Paris museum, sent them from Martinique, but collected in St. 

 Thomas and San Domingo. The former was undoubtedly the type locality. 



The species is known from Porto Rico, St. Thomas, St. Croix, Tortola, 

 Just van Dyke, and Vieques. Garman records specimens collected by Acker- 

 mann at Port au Prince, Haiti; but Stejneger surmises, undoubtedly quite 



