Figures 99-114 



C. anastasia Field 

 99. Male, upper surface, holotype. 



100. Lower surface of 99. 



C. anfracta (Druce) 



101. Male, upper surface, Chanchania\'o, Peru, compared with holotype. 



102. Lower surface of 101. 



C. fractunda Field 

 10.1. Male, lower surface, holot\'pe. 



104. LIpper surface of 103. 



C. indigo (Druce) 



105. Male, upper surface, Alato Grosso, Brazil, compared with holotype. 



106. Lower surface of 105. 



C. xeneta xenela (Hewitson) 



107. Male, lower surface, Nicaragua, compared with lectotype. 



108. L'pper surface of 107. 



C. vitruvia (Hewitson) 



109. Male, lower surface, Iquitos, Peru, compared with holotype of vitruvia and lectotype 



oi foriuna (Druce). 



110. Upper surface of 109. 



C. torqueor (Druce) 



111. Male, upper surface, Caramang Ri\'er, British Guiana, a paratype compared with 



holotype. 



112. Lower surface of 111. 



C. nicolayi Field 



113. Male, lower surface, holotype. 



114. Upper surface of 113 



