116 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. vol.47. 



DYOMYX JONESI Schaus. 



Dyomyx jonesi Schaus, Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc, vol. 6, 1898, p. 120. 

 Dijomyx obliquata Schaus, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), vol. 7, 1911, p. 62. 



I have the unique types of jonesi from Brazil and oUiguata from 

 Costa Rica. Both are males and almost identical. 



DYOMYX ZATES Dnice. 



Dyomyx zates Druce, Biol. Cent.-Amer., Lep. Het., vol. 2, 1898, p. 500. 

 Two specunens are before me from Costa Rica. 



DYOMYX ORA Dyar. 



To be more fully described in my fourth Mexican paper. I have a 

 female from Mexico and another from Panama. This is not improb- 

 ably an ornate variety of D. cimolia Guenee. 



DYOMYX JUNO Moschler. 

 Dyoimjx juno Moschler, Abh. Senck. Nat. Ges., vol. 14, 1886, p. 197. 

 This is not before me. 



DYOMYX VOLCANICA Schaus. 



Dyomyx volcanica Schaus, Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc, vol. 6, 1898, p. 119. 

 The type and tlii-ee other Mexican specimens are before me and two 

 from Costa Rica. 



DYOMYX PLACIDA Schaus. 

 Dyomyx pladda Schaus, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), vol. 8, 1901, p. 39. 

 Six specimens are before me from Mexico, including the type. In 

 one specimen the whole median space is ocherous. 



DYOMYX CIMOLIA Guenfee. 



Dyomyx cimolia Guenee, Spec. Gen., vol. 6, 1852, p. 282. 



Dyomyx pavo Walker, Cat. Brit. Mus., Lep. Het., part 15, 1858, p. 1769. 



Two specimens from Mexico are before me. 



DYOMYX ANCEA Cramer. 



Phalxna Noctua ancea Cramer, Pap. Exot., vol. 4, 1782, p. 72, pi. 324, fig. G. 



Platyja^ ancea Hx^bner, Verz. bek. Schmett., 1816, p. 268. 



Dyomyx ancea Guenee, Spec. Gen., vol. 6, 1852, p. 282. 



Dyomyx ancea Walker, Cat. Brit. Mus., Lep. Het., vol. 12, 1857, p. 854. 



Unknown to me except by Cramer's figure. The figure is bad, but 

 seems nearest to cimolia Guenee of anything before me. I have so 

 few cimolia that I can not form a good idea of the extent of its varia- 

 tion. 



» The type of Platyja Hiibner must be taken to be umminea Cramer (first species), designated by Hamp- 

 son (Moths of India, vol. 2, 1894, p. 539). 



