NO. 2046. THE GENERA PALINDIA AND DYOMYX—DYAR. 109 



EULEPIDOTIS NICffiA Druce. 



Palindia nicsea Druce, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), vol. 5, 1900, p. 518. 

 This is unknown to me, but appears from the description close to 

 the following. 



EULEPIDOTIS TELIGERA Brabant. 



Palindia teligera Brabant, Le Nat. (2), vol. 23, 1910, p. 31. 



Palindia vivida Dognin, Het. nouv. I'Amer. du sud, vol. 6, 1912, p. 20. 



Brabant described from Venezuela, Dognm from Paraguay. I 

 have five specimens from Venezuela agreemg perfectly with the 

 descriptions of both authors. 



EULEPIDOTIS ARGYRITIS Butler. 

 Eulepidotis argyritis Butler, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1879, p. 29. 



Described from Brazil. I have one from Venezuela and eight 

 from Mexico, one of the latter compared with Butler's type by Mr. 

 Schaus. 



EULEPIDOTIS SUPPURA Dyar. 



This will be described more fully m my fourth Mexican paper. I 

 have six cotypes from Mexico and Venezuela. 



EULEPIDOTIS ELECTA Dyar.i 



This will be mentioned more in detail in my forthcommg Panama 

 report. Twenty-six specimens are before me from Venezuela, 

 Panama, Costa Kica, and Mexico. 



EULEPIDOTIS RECTIMARGO Guenfie. 



Palindia redimargo Guenee, Spec. Gen., vol. 6, 1852, p. 276. 



Thirty-five specimens are before me from BrazU, Paraguay, the 

 Guianas, Venezuela, Panama, Costa Kica, and Mexico. 



EULEPIDOTIS METAMORPHA, new species. 



Very similar to rectimargo, differing priacipally in the direction of 

 the crossband, which runs obliquely from tornus to costa at basal 

 third and is joined completely to the base by the costal dash. Hmd 

 wing with the mark fainter, its preceding dash very distinct. Ex- 

 panse, 30 mm. 



Tijpe. — Male, Cat. No. 15110, U. S. Nat. Mus.; Matanzas, Cuba, 

 November, 1902 (W. Schaus). 



EULEPIDOTIS SANTAREMA Walker. 



Palindia santarema Walker, Cat. Brit. Mus., Lep. Het., part 33, 1865, p. 806. 

 This species is not before me. 



EULEPIDOTIS CANDIDA Bar. 

 Palindia Candida Bar, Ann. Soc. Ent. France, (5), vol. 6, 1876, p. 8. 

 This is not before me, but Bar's figure leaves no room for doubt as 

 to the identity of this form. 



1 Proc. U. S. Nat, Mus., vol. 47, 1914, p. 210. 



