TABLE 6 



CONTACTS BETWEEN STOMATAL COMPLEXES 



Percentage of stomatal 



complexes in contact 



with one or more other 



stomatal complexes 



Percentage of stomatal 

 complexes which 

 share subsidiary 



cells 



Percentage of contacts 

 which entail sharing 



of subsidiary cells 

 (column 2 column I) 



Types of sharing of 



subsidiary cells by 



two adjacent stomatal 



complexes* 



Asplundia pycnantha 



Carludovica pahnata 

 Cyclanthus bipartitus 



Dicranopygium 



• t 



crmitum 



Evodianthus funifer 



Ludovia land folia 



Schultesiophytum 

 chorianthum 



Sphaeradenia 

 killipii 



Stelestvlis 

 stvlaris 



■ 



Thoracocarpus 

 hissed us 



50.39c (n= 150 



complexes) 



64.2% (n= 151) 

 97.09c (n=13l) 



49.1% (n= 1 59) 



47.7% (n= 1 55) 

 4% (n=200) 



66.9% (n= 1 54) 



65.4% (n= 1 53) 



70.9% (n= 1 82) 



78.3%(n=l43) 



•Types of sharing are defined by Wilder (in press a) 



2% (n=200 



complexes) 



ll%(n=200) 



2%(n=200) 



0%(n=200) 

 0% (n=200) 



2% (n=200) 



7%(n=200) 



7%(n=200) 



6%(n=200) 



4.0% 



11.3% 



4.1% 



0% 

 0% 



3.0% 



10.7% 



9.9% 



r 



7.7% 



Type 1: I00% (n=2 

 pairs of complexes) 



Type 1:54.5% 

 Type 2: 27.3% 

 Type 3: 18.2% 

 (n=l I) 



Type 1: 100% 

 (n=2) 



0% 

 0% 



Type 1 : 50% 

 Type 2: 50% 

 (n=2) 



Type 1 : 1 00% 

 (n=7) 



Type I: 85.7% (n=7) 

 Type 3: 14.3% 



Type 1:33.3% 

 Type 3: 66.6% 

 (n=6) 



