The specimen, on which the original report was based, 
may well be L.condylobulbon. 
Liparis nesophila Reichenbach filius Otia Bot. 
Hamb. (1878) 56; Xen. Orch. 3 (1881) 81. 
Furi: Wilkes U.S. South Pacif. Expl. Exped. 
Ridley has cited the Wilkes specimen under L. longi- 
pes Lindl. and has reduced L.nesophila Reichb.f. to that 
species. 
Liparis vitiensis Rolfe in Kew Bull. (1921) 54. 
Fri: (im Thurn 370); Parks 20369 (2). 
Presumably the Parks specimen belongs to Rolfe’s 
species, but Rolfe’s description of L.vitiensis is not very 
good and I[ have seen no authentic material of the species. 
CHRYSOGLOSSUM Blume 
Chrysoglossum Gibbsiae Rolfe ev Gibbs in Journ. 
Linn. Soc. Bot. 89 (1909) 175. 
Fri: (Gibbs S886). 
Chrysoglossum ornatum Blume Bijdr. (1825) 308 ; 
Fl. Jav. Orch. (1858) 186, t. 46. 
Fis1: Gillespie 3196, 3199.1; Wilkes U.S. South Pacif. Expl. Exped. 
Java, Sumatra, Celebes. 
Chrysoglossum vesicatum Reichenbach filius in 
Seemann Fl. Vit. (1868) 804. 
Fist: (Seemann 611). 
COELOGYNE Lindley 
Coelogyne sp. 
Fir: Gillespie 429°. 
The genus Coelogyne does not seem to have been re- 
[117 ] 
