ItlKDS — I'KIXGILLIDAE C'ARrODACUS FRONTALIS. 417 



uuder parts are much more streaked. These two specimens I am inclined to consider as distinct 

 ironi C frontalis, and probahly entitled to the name of hncinorrhuu.s, Waj^ler.' 



Tlie Carpodacus rliudoculpus oi' Cabanis resembles very closely some of those California speci- 

 mens mentioned as so similar to C. purpuretis. Should they be distinct, Cabanis' name might 

 with propriety be applied to them. I scarcely think, however, that the name can stand. 



The C«r/;otZaa« /ron/a/iA' of New llexico is readily distinguished from C. 'purpureim, by the 

 fact that the middle of the crown is not continuously red, the ear coverts and under the eye 

 brown, not red ; the back and wings are uniforni brown, the feathers with lighter edges, the 

 red of the rump quite sharply defined, instead of having the red over the back and wings The 

 belly is strongly streaked with brown, instead of being nearly white. The size is considerably 

 less ; the bill shorter, broader, and considerably more convex and curved. 



C. casslnii has the back more glossed with red and strongly streaked with dark brown, instead 

 of being nearly uniform ; the belly is very little streaked, instead of strongly so. The size is 

 much larger ; the bill larger, and straighter. 



Note. — A series of Carpodacus frontalis recently collected at Fort Tejon, by Mr. Vesey, 

 strengthens the impression that there is really but one species from the Rocky Mountains to the 

 Pacitic, and that this varies greatly in the tint and extent of the red with age and season. 

 Thus, in the most highly colored specimen, 10219, the back is so much tinged with red as to 

 connect that on the head and rump, the centre of tlie crown being scarcely less intense than 

 the sides and front. Beneath, the bright red extends to the middle of the belly, and farther 

 back on the sides. In 10220 the back has only the faintest possible gloss of red ; the middle 

 of the crown less deeply colored. No. 10221 has the red of the under parts restricted ratlier 

 abruptly to the fore part of the breast. In 10222, a young male, the red extends further 

 behind, but there is none on the rump. All these are summer skins. No. 10223, an autumnal 

 skin, his the same distribution of red as in 10219, but it is as uniform and continuous to the 

 middle of the belly as in the purple finch. The colors are duller, however, and the whole 

 plumage has a softened character ; 10224 has the red on the belly more restricted, and. 

 almost none on the rump. 



' Carpodacus haemorrhocs, Sclater. 



Frinsilla hatmorrhoa, "LiciiT." Waclek, Isis, 1831, 525. LiCBT. Preis-Verzeich. 1831, sp. 57. 

 Pyrrhulinola hacmorrhou, Br. Comptcs Rendus, 1856. 

 Carpodacns haemorrhous, Sclater, Pr. Zool. Soc. 1856, 304. 



Several specimens of Carpodacus in the collection of the Philadelphia Academy, probably from Mexico or Lower California, 

 altliough labelled Norlh America, agree with numbers 2706 and 4568 in the very precise and sharp definition of the red colors. 

 The forehead for less than the length of the bill, a broad superciliary stripe extending as far behind tlie eye as the tip of the bill 

 is in front of it, the base of the lower jaw, and the chin and throat, but not the breast, with the rump but not the upper tail 

 coTcrts, are crimson. And no where else (in five specimens) is there any indication of a reddish gloss, not even in the middle 

 of the crown, on the neck, or back. The width of the red on the throat is scarcely one-fourth the circuirifercnce of tlie neck. 



Upon a re-examination of the subject, I am by no means sure that the bird just referred to is the true Fringilla hacmirrkous 

 of Wagler, which seems nearer to the true /ronfali j. It may possibly not yet have received a name. 



53 b 



