CATALOG OF TYPE SPECIMENS OF MAMMALS 319 



210698. Skin and skull. Adult female. Pinacate Mountains, 

 Sonora, Mexico. February 1915. Collected by Charles Sheldon. 

 Original number 11962-X. 



Well-uiade skin in good condition except for sewed laceration below 

 left ear ; skull Grade B. 



fPeromyscus eremicus phaeurus Osgood. 



Proc. Biol. Soe. Washington 17 : 75, Mar. 21, 1904. 

 60438. Skin and skull. Adult female. Hacienda La Parada, San 

 Luis Potosi, Mexico. August 20, 1892. Collected by E. W. 

 Nelson. Original number 3227. 

 Well-made skin in good condition ; skull Grade B. 



fPeromyscus eremicus polypolius Osgood. 



North Amer. Fauna 28 : 248, Apr. 17, 1909. 

 146074. Skin and skull. Adult male. Margarita Island, off west 

 coast of southern Lower California, Mexico. November 30, 1905. 

 Collected by E. W. Nelson and E. A. Goldman. Original number 

 18676. 

 Well-made skin iu good condition ; skull Grade A. 



fPeromyscus felipensis Merriam. 



Proe. Biol. Soc. Washington 12 : 122, Apr. 30, 1898. 

 =Peromyscus difficilis felipensis Merriam. See Osgood, North Amer. Fauna 

 28 : 182, Apr. 17, 1909. 



68409. Skin and skull. Adult male. Cerro San Felipe, altitude 

 10,200 feet, Oaxaca, Mexico. August 22, 1894. Collected by 

 E. W. Nelson and E. A. Goldman. Original number 6611. 

 Well-made skin in good condition ; skull Grade A. 



*Hesperomys gambelii Baird. Cotypes. 



Mammals of North America, p. 464, 1857. 

 =Pei-omyscus manieulatns gambelii (Baird). See Osgood, North Amer. 

 Fauna 28 : 182, Apr. 17, 1909. 



. ^^^ . Skin and skull, and tail vertebrae. 



1282 



-^. Skin (lost) and skull, and tail vertebrae. 1853. Monterey, 



Monterey County, Calif. Collected by W. P. Trowbridge. Skins 

 cataloged January 4, 1853 ; skulls, January 6, 1855. 



J. A. Allen discusses the status of the type of this species in Bull. 

 Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 5: 190-191, 1893. He says: "Hesperomys gambelUi 

 Baird was based primarily on two mounted specimens (Nos. •— and 

 —■ ) from Monterey, Calif., of which No. 369 should probably be regarded 

 as the type, as it is the only specimen specifically mentioned in the orig- 

 inal account of the species. This specimen, F. W. Time informs me (in 

 a letter dated June 8, 1893), is not now extant, and has not been in the 



