38 U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 282 



Odell, 1935, p. 132.— Fowler, 1935a, pp. 7, 19, fig. 36 (6 mi. NW. of Bennetts- 

 vllle,* S.C.). — Greene, 1935, pp. 144-145, map 60 (ecology; Wisconsin 

 distribution [one exception]). — O'Donnell, 1935, p. 484 (ecology; Illinois 

 distribution). — Ewers and Boesel, 1935, pp. 58, 63 (food; Buckeye L., 

 Ohio).— Aitken, 1936, p. 33 (Iowa) .—Fowler, 1936b, p. 150 (Florida rec- 

 ords). — Hoover, 1936, p. 239 (Merrimack R.* and Penacook L., near Concord, 

 N.H.).— Greeley, 1937, pp. 87, 97 (ecology; New York records). — Odell and 

 Senning, 1937, p. 108 (New York records).— Carr, 1937, p. 81.— Toner, 1937, 

 p. 14 (Belleville, Ontario). — Murray, 1938, p. 84 (in Indiana trout streams). — 

 Blatchley, 1938, pp. 66-67.— R. M. Bailey, 1938, pp. 151-182 (ecology; repro- 

 duction; introduced, Merrimack Co., N.H.: Penacook L.,* 2.5 mi. WNW. 

 Concord; Merrimack R., 1.25 mi. SE.* Concord and 2 mi. SSE.* Concord). — 

 Schrenkeisen, 1938, p. 166.— Baker and Parker, 1938, p. 161 (Reelfoot L.,* 

 Tenn.). — Bailey and Oliver, 1939, p. 152 (compiled). — Hubbs and Lagler, 

 1939, p. 26 (comparison; Great Lakes basin). — Trautman, 1939, pp. 279, 

 287 (Ohio records). — Dymond, 1939, pp. 27-28 (Ontario ecology and rec- 

 ords). — Bangham and Hunter, 1939, pp. 401-434 (parasites, W. Lake 

 Erie).— Kuhne, 1939, p. 68, fig. 43.— Baker, 1939a, p. 21 (Reelfoot L., 

 Tenn.*); 1939b, p. 44 (comparison; Reelfoot L.*).— Raney, 1939b, pp. 675, 

 677 (associations; Cayuga L., Ithaca,* N.Y.). — Fowler, 1940b, p. 8 (Penn- 

 sylvania records relisted [in part only]).^Hubbs and Lagler, 1941, pp. 63-64, 

 fig. 83 (comparison; range; ecology). — Bangham, 1941a, pp. 296, 302-305 

 (parasites; Hardee? Co., Fla.) ; 1941b, p. 445 (parasites; Buckeye L., Ohio). — 

 Harkness and Pierce, 1941, p. 112 (L. Mize, Fla.) .—Aitken, 1941, p. 389 

 (Iowa).— Driver, 1942, p. 254 [and 1950, p. 262].— Bangham and Venard, 



1942, p. 29 (parasites, Reelfoot L.).— Eddy and Surber, 1943, pp. 151-162, 

 fig. 29 (comparison; ecology; Minnesota distribution and records: St. Louis 

 R. [system], trib. to L. Superior; L. Itasca; others compiled). — Bennett, 



1943, p. 365 (population size estimated, artificial lake, 111.). — Hubbs and 

 Lagler, 1943, p. 80 (Foots Pond,* Ind.).— Haas, 1943, p. 163 (Fox and Rock 

 R. systems. 111.). — Hinks, 1943, pp. 58, 61 (figured; Red and Assiniboine 

 R. systems, Manitoba). — Toole, 1943, p. 12 (ecology; Texas). — Smith and 

 Moyle, 1944, p. 115 (relisted).— Radforth, 1944, pp. 6-62, figs. 22-23 

 (ecology; Ontario and L. Erie distribution; distribution compared with 

 isotherms). — Goin, 1944, p. 146 (near Gainesville, Fla.; about hyacinth 

 roots). — Fowler, 1945, pp. 32-271, fig. 164 (synonymy, distribution, and 

 records, SE. U.S.). — Bangham, 1946, pp. 294, 302 (parasites, Lake-du-Bay, 

 Wis.). — Cuerrier, Fry, and Prefontaine, 1946, p. 26 (St. Lawrence R., near 

 Montreal).— Melancon, 1946, p. 130.— Brimley, 1946, p. 15 (North Carolina 

 records). — Marshall, 1947, p. 71 (Blue Springs, Fla.). — Baughman, 1950, 

 p. 131 (Texas). — Neil, 1951, p. 765 (in crayfish burrows, Emanuel Co., 

 Ga.). — ?Fowler, 1951a, p. 91 (Lancaster Co., Pennsylvania records). — 

 Hunt, 1953, p. 15 (Tamiami Canal, Fla.).— Hubbs, 1957, p. 98 (Texas dis- 

 tribution). — Keleher and Kooyman, 1957, pp. 106, 110 (Manitoba distribu- 

 tion; north to central L. Winnipeg). — G. Moore, 1957, pp. 142-144, figs. 

 2-77b, 2-79F, 2-80.— Hubbs and Lagler, 1957, p. 5; 1958, pp. 89, 91, fig. 

 175.— C. Hubbs, 1958, p. 8 (Texas distribution) .—Slastenenko, 1958a, p. 7 

 (Canadian distribution); 1958b, pp. 248, 353, fig. 102 (compiled).— W. B. 

 Scott, 1958, p. 19 (Canadian distribution). — Lambou, 1959b, p. 192 (in 



♦Material designated by an asterisk has been re-examined. 



