190 U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 282 



souri and Arkansas, and the hiatus in distribution, as based on the few 

 records from the upper Tennessee River, between N. flavipinnis and 

 N. miurus may not be real. Thus, although they may be ecologically 

 segregated, distributions could easily overlap. They are regarded as 

 full species because the morphological differences separating them are 

 rather prominent and remain quite constant, permitting identifica- 

 tion of all individuals. There is no indication that intergradation 

 occurs. 



Noturus miurus Jordan 



BRINDLED MADTOM 



Plates 4 (fig. 13), 19 (figs. 1, 2); Map 14 



Noturus mar ginatus Baird [misidentifications]. — E. W. Nelson, 1876, p. 50 (Wabash 

 Valley and S. in Illinois). — Jordan, 1876b, p. 303 (description; range [com- 

 plex]). — ? Jordan and Copeland, 1876, p. 160 (range [complex]). — Jordan and 

 Gilbert, 1877a, p. 2 (Ohio Valley [complex]; Indiana). 



Noturus miurus Jordan, 1877a, p. 46 (nomen nudum; Indiana records: Maumee 

 R. basin; lower Wabash R. basin; White R., near Indianapolis); 1877b, pp. 

 370-377 (original description; Ohio Valley* and SW.; immediate neighbor- 

 hood of Indianapolis, Ind., in White R.* and small tribs.) ; 1877c, p. 50 

 (present but not noticed by Rafinesque in Ohio Valley) ; 1877d, pp. 73-120, 

 pi. 39, figs. 60-61b (comparison; synonymy [in error]; range [L. Michigan 

 and Wisconsin erroneous]; relationship; Falls of the Ohio; type from White R., 

 Ind. and specimen from Ohio R., W. Va., figured). — [Klippart], 1877, p. 153 

 (compiled). — Jordan, 1877e, p. 613 (range); 1878a, p. 119 (range; Tangipahoa 

 [error for Natalbany?*] R.) ; 1878b, p. 68 (synonymy; Illinois distribution, 

 including Wabash R. and Cache R., Johnson Co.); 1878c, p. 368 (compiled). 

 — Jordan and Brayton, 1878, pp. 87-95 (distribution [but not in Illinois R. 

 basin]; relationship). — Jordan, 1878d [and 1884], p. 336 (description; range 

 [Iowa erroneous]) ; 1878e, p. 414 (range) ; 1882, pp. 745-801 (synonymj^ [in 

 error]; description; Ohio distribution; records complied). — Jordan and 

 Gilbert, 1883, p. 99 (description; range [but not in Minnesota]). — Swain and 

 Kalb, 1883, pp. 638-644 (comparison, synonymy, and range [in error]; 

 compiled records ; Blue R.). — Gilbert, 1884, p. 199 (Indiana records including 

 Salt Cr. [Bloomington*], Monroe Co.). — Jordan, 1885, p. 802 (general range, 

 but not footnote). — Graham, 1885b, p. 71 (branches of Missouri R., Kansas 

 [erroneous]). — Forbes, 1885a, p. 84 (Cache* and Wabash Rivers, 111.). — 

 Jordan and Gilbert, 1886, pp. 6, 10 (Poteau R.,* Indian Territory; Lees Cr.,* 

 Arlc.; Saline R., Benton,* and ?Washita [Ouachita] R., Ark. [both complex]). 

 — Eigenmann and Fordice, 1886, p. 410 (Bean Blossom Cr., Ind.* [complex]). 

 — Jenkins, 1887, p. 94 (streams, Vigo Co., Ind.). — Evermann and Jenkins, 

 1888, pp. 44-56 (Indiana records). — Jordan, 1889, pp. 351-352 (comparison). — 

 Henshall, 1889, p. 124 (Ohio record) .—Jordan, 1890, pp. 125-127, 158-166 

 (Indiana records [in part] including West Fork White R., Spencer*). — Linton, 

 1891, p. 359 (no parasites; Black R., Ohio).— ? Gilbert, 1891, pp. 146, 152 

 (Duck R., Columbia City, Tenn. ; Cypress Cr., Florence, Ala. [possibly 

 both are in error]). — McCormick, 1892, p. 13 (Ohio records). — Woolman, 

 1892a, pp. 251-287 (Kentucky records: Rolling Fork of Salt R., at Booth,* 



♦Material indicated by an asterisk has been re-examined. 



