192 U.S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 2 82 



misidentified]) . — Moenkhaus, 1896, p. 160 (Patoka R., near Huntingburg,* 

 Ind.). — Evermann and Cox, 1896, pp. 365-426 (compiled [erroneous]). — 

 Jordan and Evermann, 1896a, pp. 145-149 (description; range [in error]); 

 1896b, p. 234 (range [in error]).— Eigenmann, 1896, p. 253 (Indiana). — 

 Osburn and Williamson, 1898, pp. 12, 19 (Franklin Co., Ohio localities in- 

 cluding Big Walnut Cr.*). — Osburn, 1901, pp. 27-29 (Ohio records [some in 

 error]). — Evermann and Goldsborough, 1901, p. 360; and 1902, p. 171 

 (L. Chautauqua,* N. Y.).— Evermann and Kendall, 1901, p. 480 [and 1902, 

 p. 210] (New York record).— Evermann, 1902, p. 95.— Bean, 1903, pp. 

 96-97, 740 (compiled).— Large, 1903, pp. 9-10 [and 1905, pp. 56-57] (de- 

 scription; Wabash and Cache R. basins, Illinois [specimen from creek near 

 Pontiac, 111., now unidentifiable; in error]). — McConnell, 1906, p. 179 

 (Pennsylvania record). — Michael, 1906, p. 9 (compiled). — Reed, 1907, 

 pp. 555-564, fig. 2 (glands and pectoral spine described). — Hankinson, 

 1908, p. 199 (Orchard L.,* Mich.).— Meek, 1908, p. 141.— Forbes and 

 Richardson, 1909 [and 1920, pp. Ixxviii-cxv], pp. Ixxiii-cix, 176-201, map 59 

 (ecology; range [in error]; Illinois distribution [see INHS material, p. 194; one 

 Wabash R. collection complex; not in Illinois R. basin]; description; fig- 

 ured). — Forbes, 1909, pp. 387-427 (range [in error]; Illinois distribution, 

 in part; ecology). — Hankinson, 1910, p. 26 (as miurrus; Kickapoo Cr., near 

 Charleston,* 111.).— Meek and Hildebrand, 1910, pp. 245, 247, fig. 22 (de- 

 scription; range [in error; undoubtedly ascribed to Chicago area on basis 

 of erroneous L. Michigan report]). — Ward, 1912, p. 226 (free of parasites). — 

 Hankinson, 1913, pp. 104-112 (ecology; Embarrass R. system. 111.). — 

 Fowler, 1913, p. 92 (compiled) .—Forbes, 1914, p. 17, fig. 26, map 59 (in part, 

 Illinois distribution).— F. C. Baker, 1916, p. 177 (food; Oneida L., N. Y.).— 

 Adams and Hankinson, 1916, p. 168 (relisted). — Evermann, 1918, pp. 

 325-366 (in part; compiled) .—Wright, 1918, p. 543 (Salmon Cr.,* N. Y.).— 

 Fowler, 1919, p. 57 (compiled).—? T. Surber, 1920, p. 21 (Red Cedar R., 

 St. Anagar, Iowa, and Austin and Ramsey, Minn, [misidentifications]). — 

 Conger, 1920, p. 11.— Dymond, 1922, p. 62 (Sandusky Bay, L. Erie).— 

 H. S. Pratt, 1923, p. 96.— Reed, 1924a, p. 445, fig. 12 (spine described).— 

 Hubbs, 1926, pp. 51-52.— Greene, 1927, pp. 308-309 (hypothetical, Wis- 

 consin; range [in error]). — Cahn, 1927, p. 42 (Wisconsin records [not now 

 identifiable; erroneous]: Menomonee R., and Fox R., near Lannan). — Adams 

 and Hankinson, 1928, pp. 385-386 (ecology; food; comparisons; Oneida L., 

 N. Y., records). — Potter and Jones, 1928, p. 355 (not in Iowa). — Hubbs and 

 Greene, 1928, p. 390.— Greeley, 1928, pp. 87-105 (Oneida L., N. Y.).— 

 Hubbs and Ortenburger, 1929, pp. 96-97 (Little Petit Jean R., 13 mi. NW. 

 Waldron,* Ark.; like Indiana examples; previous records, Oklahoma and 

 Arkansas [in part]). — Greeley, 1929, pp. 165, 174 (Sandusky Bay, L. Erie). — 

 Hubbs and Brown, 1929, pp. 2-42 (distribution; Ontario records: Sydenham 

 R.,* 23 mi. E. Sarnia, below Strathroy; Dedricks Cr.,* 1 mi. W. Port 

 Rowan). — Thompson and Hunt, 1930, pp. 27-65, map 34 (ecology; Salt 

 Fork system, Champaign Co., 111.). — Osburn, WickliflF, and Trautman, 

 1930, p. 174 (Ohio).— Hubbs, 1930, p. 432 (comparison) .—Shurrager, 1932, 

 pp. 386, 404-409, tables 1-4, 6-8 (ecology and distribution; Hocking R. 

 system, Ohio [table 1 confused; see also UMMZ material, p. 195]). — R. A. 

 Moore, 1933, p. 17 (kidneys described). — ^V. Bailey, 1933, p. 584 [and in sepa- 

 rate, p. 202] (Green R.,* Ky., near Mammoth Cave). — Hankinson, 1933, p. 568 

 (open or barren shallows of Michigan inland lakes) . — ^Van Cleave and Mueller, 



♦Material indicated by an asterisk has been re-examined. 



