114 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM VOLUME 1 



396.— Sardebon, Amer. Geol., vol. 21, Feb. 1898, p. 136.— Bather, Geol. Mag, new ser., Dec. 

 4, vol. 6, 1899, pp. 34, 37, 38; in Wachsmuth and Springer's Monograph on crinoids, 1899, pp. 

 .327, 419, 425, 523, 34, 37, 38; Rep. British Assoc, for 1898, 1899, p. 923.— Emery, Compcndio 

 Zoo'l., 1899, p. 218.— Jaekel, Stammesgeschichte der Pelmatozoen, pt. 1, Thecoidea und 

 Cystoidea, 1899, p. 102; Neiies Jahrb. Min., 1899, vol. 1, pp. 375, 376, 378.— MacBride, Proc. 

 4th Internal. Congr. Zool., Cambridge, 1899, p. 146.— Sardeson, Amer. Geol., vol. 24, Novem- 

 ber 1899, p. 276.— SoLLAS, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, vol. 55, 1899, p. 715.— Thompson, Proc. 

 Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. 22, 1899, p. 322.— Burbridoe, Science Gossip, new ser., vol. 7, 1900, 

 p. 215.— IIoussAY, La forme et la vie, Paris, 1900, p. 132.— Perrier, Cours elemcntairo de 

 zoologie, 1900, pp. 246, 250. — Bather, in Lankester, A treatise on zoology, pt. 3, Echinoderma, 

 1900, pp. 106, 111, 112, 113, 121, 122, 125, 126, 128, 132, 135, 136, 137, 195; Journ. London Coll. 

 Soc, vol. S, 1901, p. 23.— Arnold, The sea-beach at ebb tide, 1901, p. 234.— [Bell], Guide to 

 the shell and star-fish galleries of the British Museum, 1901, p. 113.— Huxley, Anatomy of 

 invertebrated animals, 1901, pp. 498, 501.— Masterman, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh, 

 vol. 14, Sess. 1899-1900, June 1901, pp. 312-313.— Russo, Zool. Anz., vol. 24, 1901, pp. 529-533.— 

 Springer, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 25, No. 1, 1901, pp. 21, 34, 38, 49, 50, 63.— Crampton, 

 Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. 14, Sess. 1900-1901, June 1902, p. 469. — Kingsley and 

 Hertwig, Man. Zool., 1902, p. 341. — Russo, Monitore zool. ital., vol. 13, suppl., 1902, pp. 

 22-24. — Davis, Natural history of animals, vol. 5, 1903, p. 278. — Delage and Herouard, 

 Traitd de Zoologie concrfete, vol. 3, 1903, p. 394. — Kingsley and Hertwig, Man. Zool., 1903, 

 p. 341. — MoRTENSEN, Medd. Gr0nland, vol. 29, 1903, p. 65. — SchxJtze, Jahresber. Ver. Wiirt- 

 temburg, 1904, p. 157; Mitt. nat. Kab. Stuttgart, No. 26, 1904, p. 157. — Simroth, Verhandl. 

 deutsch. Zool. Ges., 1904, p. 101. — Sperry, Rep. Michigan Acad. Sci., 1904, p. 198. — Doderlein, 

 Fauna Arctica, vol. 4, Lief. 2, 1905, pp. 397, 404.— Godlewski, Bull. Ac. Cracovie, 1905, p. 501. — 

 MiNCKERT, .\rch. Naturg., vol. 71, 1905, p. 160. — Reichensperger, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 

 vol. 46, No. 10, 1905, p. 171; Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool., vol. 80, 1905, p. 153.— Retzius, Biolog. 

 Untersuch., new ser., vol. 12, 1905, p. 82.— Chubb, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, Sect. B, vol. 198, 

 1906, pp. 447-505.— Springer, Journ. Geol., vol. 14, No. 6, 1906, pp. 474, 479, 488, 494, 497, 

 503, 504, 507, 508. — Chadwick, Liverpool Mar. Biol. Comm., Mem. 15, "A7itedon," 1907, p. 

 1.— A. H. Clark, Smithsonian Misc. CoU., vol. 50, 1907, pt. 3, p. 343 (included by P. H. Car- 

 penter in the Family Comatulidae), p. 344 (subsequent revision), p. 351 (redefined and re- 

 stricted so that it is practically the equivalent of Carpenter's Tenella Group). — Doderlein, 

 Die gestielten Crinoiden der Siboja-Exped., p. 8 (free adult life), p. 20 (only recent genus in 

 which infrabasals have been shown). — Sterzinger, Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool., vol. 88, 1907, p. 375 

 (slime glands in tentacles). — A. H. Clark, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 51, No. 8, 1908, p. 247 

 (redefined and restricted); Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 33, 1908, p. 683 (reference to recent revi- 

 sion); vol. 34, 1908, p. 211 (referred to Antedonidae, restricted); vol. 35, 1908, p. 119 (arm struc- 

 ture); Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 21, 1908, p. 125 (unsatisfactory status; restricted by 

 removal of 11 genera herein described), p. 136 (placed in Family Antedonidae, restricted), p. 

 229 (compared with Mastigomelra) ; Amer. Nat., vol. 42, No. 500, 1908, p. 542 (characteristic 

 of Mediterranean-northeast Atlantic fauna); No. 503, p. 725 (color). — Reichensperger, Zool. 

 Anz., vol. 33, 1908, pp. 363-367 (glands). — Steinmann, Die geolog. Grundlagen der Abstam- 

 mungslchre, 1908, p. 149 (geological relations), p. 150 (arm structure). — Bather, Ann. Mag. 

 Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. 4, 1909, p. 39 (discussion). — A. H. Clark, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 

 vol. 22, 1909, p. 1 (history of revision), p. 176 (referred to Antedoninae) ; Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 

 ser. 8, vol. 3, 1909, p. 308; Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 36, 1909, p. 361 (relationship to Actino- 

 metra), p. 362 (compared with Comatilia), p. 494 (use by P. H. Carpenter); Amer. Nat., vol. 43, 



1909, p. 586 (impossibility of finding the solution of the arm structure in the ontogeny), p. 587 

 (only differs from the Pentacrinidae in the fact that in the latter the short discoidal segments 

 at the summit of the column are greatly multiplied); Vid. Medd. Nat. Foren. K0benhavn, 1909, 

 p. 128 (East Indian origin of the genus), p. 190 (relationships with Mastigometra), p. 191 (specific 

 interrelationships within the genera Antedon and Mastigometra are the same). — Hertwig and 

 Kingsley, Man. Zool., 1909, p. 342.— Oswald, Sci. Progr., No. 13, July 1009, p. 133.— Cumings, 

 Pop. Sci. Monthly, vol. 77, No. 3, Sept. 1910, p. 304.— Vaney, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris, No. 3^ 



1910, p. 160 (relation to 10-rayed comatulids).— A. H. Clark, Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 29, 1910, 

 art. 30, p. 354 (symmetry); Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 38, 1910, p. 118 (basals in young in primi- 



