KT 3 A MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS 115 



tive condition), p. 212 (specialization of the larvae), p. 214 (origin of characteristic type of 

 column), p. 215 (basals compared with those of the pentacrinites), p. 329 (comparative develop- 

 ment of the species; infrabasals; primarily an Indian Ocean genus related to Masligomelra); 

 vol. 39, 1911, p. 560 (compared with Toxometra); vol. 40, 1911, p. 2 (some species of this genus 

 possibly represented by one of Gu6rin-M6neviUe's figures of Comatula carinaia), p. 9 (with 

 Leplomelra characterizes the European faunal area), p. 10 (closely related to Mastigomelra), 

 pp. 651-654 (structure of young compared with that of Marsupites and Uiniacrinus) ; Amer. 

 Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 32, 1911, p. 131 (significance in the European fauna; origin); Mem. Aus- 

 tralian Mus., vol. 4, 1911, pp. 708, 709, 726.— Kihk, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 41, 1911, pp. 33, 

 65, 66, 67, 75, 76, 79, 95, 96. — A. H. Clark, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 2, 1912, No. 13, 

 pp. 309, 310 (anal plate); Crinoids of the Indian Ocean, 1912, pp. 13, 21, 25. — Hartl.vub, Mem. 

 Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 27, No. 4, 1912, pp. 282, 285, 370, 371.— Patten, Evolution of verte- 

 brates, 1912, p. 425 (developmental homologies). — Reichensperger, Zeitsclir. Wiss. Zool., 

 vol. 101, Heft 1/2, 1912, p. 3.— Bather, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1913, p. 903 (porosity of plates 

 in the larva). — Springer and Clark, in Zittel-Eastman's Paleontology, 1913, pp. 181, 236. — 

 A. H. Clark, Internat. Rev. gesamt. Hydrobiol. und Hydrogr., vol. 6, 1914, p. 5; in Michaelsen 

 and Hartmeyer, Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfavma Westafrikas, Echinod. II, Crinoidea, 



1914, pp. 311, 313, 314, 315-316, 317 (detailed systematic account); Die Crinoiden der Antarktis, 



1915, pp. 181, 190; Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 65, 1915, No. 10, p. 16 (phylogenetic study) . — 

 Apstein, Sitz. Ges. Nat. Freunde, Berlin, No. 5, May 1915, p. 129.— Bather, Geol. Mag., new 

 ser., Dec. 6, vol. 2, 1915, p. 401; Studies in Edrioasteroidea, 1915, p. 401. — Schuchert, U.S. 

 Nat. Mus. Bull. 88, 1915, p. 48. — Wanner, Die Permischen Echinodermen von Timor, pt. 1, 



1916, p. 137 (comparison with Embryocrinus) , p. 244 (anal compared with the radianal in the 

 Flexibilia Impinnata). — -Leidenfrost, Alatt. Kozlem Budapest, vol. 16, 1917, p. 12 {Najade 

 Exped.).— A. H. Clark, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., vol. 7, 1917, No. 5, p. 127; No. 16, p. 

 505; Unstalked crinoids of the Siboja-Exped., 1918, p. 197 (in key; range), p. 203 (key to the 

 Included species). — Bather, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 1, No. 4, 1918, pp. 294-302 (anal 

 plate and its homologies). — Mortensen, Vid. Medd. Nat. Foren. K0benhavn, vol. 71, 1920, p. 

 151; vol. 72, 1920, pp. 70-79; Studies in the development of crinoids, 1920, pp. 7-23, 23-30, 59. — 

 A. H. Clark, Univ. Iowa Studies in Nat. Hist., vol. 9, No. 5, 1921, pp. 12, 18; Smithsonian Misc. 

 Coll., vol. 72, No. 7, 1921, pp. 11, 19, 27, 28.— Goldring, Review of the Crinoidea Flexibilia, 

 1921, p. 3. — Koehler, Faune de France, 1, Echinodermes, 1921, pp. 192, 193, 195. — Mortensen, 

 Studies in the development and larval forms of echinoderms, Copenhagen, 1921, p. 237. — 

 Garstang, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), vol. 35, 1922, pp. 95-97, 100 (bearing on the theory of 

 recapitulation). — -A. H. Clark, The Danish /ngoy-Exped., vol. 4, No. 5, Crinoidea, 1923, p. 41 

 (range), p. 52 (in key). — MacBride, Nature, vol. Ill, 1923, p. 47 (criticism of Mortensen on 

 echinoderm larvae).— Gisl£n, Zool. Bidrag Uppsala, vol. 9, 1924, pp. 30, 59, 102, 105, 106, 112, 

 114-116, 131, 272, 273, 284. — Grobben, Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math, nat., ser. 1, vol. 132, pts. 

 9, 10, 1924, p. 265 (phylogeny), pp. 266, 269, 271, 276, 278, 279, 280.— Koehler, Les (5chino- 

 dermes des mers d'Europe, vol. 1, 1924, p. 38 (regeneration), p. 41 (hexamerous and tetramerous 

 individuals) .^Mortensen, Danmarks Fauna, No. 27, 1924, p. 21 (in key), p. 23 (diagnosis). — 

 M'Intosh, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 18, 1926, p. 261.— Gisl^n, Vid. Medd. Nat. Foren. 

 K0benhavn, vol. 83, 1927, p. 6. — Mortensen, Handbook of the echinoderms of the British 

 Isles, 1927, p. 12 (hydropores), p. 26 (in key), p. 27 (diagnosis; British species), p. 28 (key to 

 included species). — Koehler, Les (5chinodermes des mers d'Europe, vol. 2, 1927, p. 116 (in key), 

 p. 122 (diagnosis; key to included species). — Korscheldt, Regeneration und transplantation, 

 Berlin, pt. 1, 1927, pp. 160, 167; pt. 2, 1931, p. 382. — Mortensen and Lieberkind, Die Tierwelt 

 der Nord- und Ostsee, Lief. 12, 1928, p. viii. 3 (in key), p. viii. 67 (activity), p. viii. 92 

 (glands).— Prenant, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, vol. 53, 1928, pp. 195-201 (sacculi); fig. 1, A-C, 

 p_ 197. — E. J. Allen, Science of the sea, 1928, pp. 276, 277. — B. Hanstrom, Vergloichende 

 Anatomie der Nervensystems der Wirbellosen Tiere unter Beriicksichtigung seiner Funktion, 

 Berlin, 1928, p. 136, p. 146.— Zirpolo, Bol. Soc. Nat. Napoli, vol. 40, 1929, pp. 52, 53.— A. H. 

 Clark, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), vol. 36, 1929, p. 660.— Rivera, Bol. Pesc. Madrid, vol. 14, 

 1929, p. 50 (in key). — Nobre, Echinodermes de Portugal, 1931, p. 164 (diagnosis). — Monro 

 in Pycraft, Standard natural history, London, 1931, ch. 7, p. 101. — Djakonov, Les Echinodermes 

 des mers arctiques (in Russian), Leningrad, 1933, p. 22 (in key). — Tortonesb, Natura, Milano, 



656-622—67 9 



