242 BULLETIN S2, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM VOLUME 1 



IIeiiouaki), Traitd de zoologie concrete, vol. 3, 1903, p. 394, fig. 494 (general account).— Reich- 

 enspeboer', Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., vol. 80, 1905, p. 24 (anatomy compared with that of [Xeocrinus] 

 decorus)- Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 4G, 1905, No. 10, p. 171 (reprint of preceding).— Przibram, 

 Naturwiss. Rundschau, vol. 21, No. 47, Nov. 22, 1906, p. 620, fig. 4, p. 620; No. 48, Nov. 29, 1906, 

 p. 633; No. 49, Dec. 6, 1906, p. 645 (regeneration). — Reichenspeeger, Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., 

 vol. 101, Heft 1/2, 1912, p. 2 (anatomy). 



.Uleria$ radiata VV. B. Carpenter, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, vol. 156, 1866, p. 680, footnote 3 (in part; 

 error for pectinata). 



Stella decacnemos rosacea W.'B. C.^.RPENTEn, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, vol. 156, 1866, p. 682 (fig. 6, pi. 

 124, in the "Encyclopodie mdthodique" identified). 



Decacnemos crocea zaffarana Neapolitanorum W. B. Carpenter, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, vol. 156, 

 1866, p. 696 (impossible to say whether this is anything else than a larger form of barbala Linck; 

 possibly the milleri of Norman and Thomson). 



Slella decacnemus barbata W. B. Carpenter, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, vol. 156, 1866, p. 696 (identical 

 with rosacea [bifida]). 



Comateln Mecznikow [E. Metschnikoff], Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., vol. 16, 1866, p. 236 (myzostomes). 



Anledon europneus LUtken, Vid. Medd. Nat. Foren. K0benhavn, 1869, Nos. 9-13, 1870, p. 180, foot- 

 note (mouth and anal tube). — Greeff, Sitz. Ges. Nat. Marburg, May 1876,No. 5, p. 88, figs. 1, 

 la, p. 90, fig. 2, p. 92, fig. 3, p. 93, fig. 4 (anatomy). — Schluter, Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., 

 vol. 30, pt. 1, 1878, p. 33. 



Comatules Baudelot, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gi5n., vol. 1, 1872, pp. 178, 186 (Port Vendres; nervous sys- 

 Xem). — VAN Beneden, Les commensaux at les parasites, 1875. — Marion, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. 

 Marseille (Zool.), vol. 1, Mem. No. 1, 1883, pp. 31, 32 (distribution about Marseille). — [Anon- 

 T-Mous], Le naturaliste, ser. 2, No. 52, May 1, 1889, p. 109, fig. 2 (popular account). — Lacaze- 

 DcTHiERS, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. vol. 112, No. 16, 1891, p. 837 (Station Arago [at Banyuls]), 

 p. 838 (Port Vendres, along the quay), p. 840 (Rosas, breeding period), p. 841 (Frontignan jetty 

 at Cette; breeding period). — Pruho, Zool. Anz., vol. 18, 1895, p. 395 (myzostomes). 



Anledon, sp. Claus, Grundztige der Zoologie, 1872, p. 225 (general account). — Balfour, Quart. 

 Journ. Micr. Sci., new ser., vol. 20, 1880, p. 390 (larval stages). — A. AfiASsrz, Mem. Mus. Comp. 

 Zool., vol. 9, No. 2, 1883, pi. 2, figs. 22, 23 (early stages).— Bather, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 

 6, vol. 5, 1890, p. 317 (discoverj' of infrabasals by Bury; Anledon a very specialized type). — 

 Beard, Zool. .\nz., vol. 17, 1894, p. 401 (myzostomes). — Kellt, Jenaische Zeitschr., vol. 35, 

 1901, pp. 469, 470 (chemical composition of the skeleton). — Russo, Zool. Anz., vol. 24, 1901, 

 pp. 529-533 (primitive stone canal and primitive gonad); figs. A-C, 1, 2, p. 530. — Godlewski, 

 Bull. Ac. Cracovie, 1905, pp. 501-506 (hybridization with echinoids, Anledon cf, Echinus 9); 

 Arch. Entwicklungsmechanik, vol. 20, Heft 4, Feb. 20, 1906, pp. 580-639 (hybrids with 

 echinoids). — Reichensperoer, Zool. Anz., vol. 33, No. 11, 1908, pp. 363-367 (glandular struc- 

 tures). — Hertwig and Kingslet, Man. Zool., 1909, figs. 324, 325, p. 341. — [Anonymous], 

 Guida per I'acquario della stazione zoologica di Napoli, 1917, p. 75 (color in life; habit of at- 

 tachment). 



Anledon rosacea Brehm, Thierleben, vol. 10, 1878, p. 446 (in part; compilation). — P. H. Carpenter, 

 Proc. Roy. Soc, vol. 28, 1879, p. 385 (in part; comparison of arms vriih those of Promachocrimis 

 [kerguelensis]) , p. 387 (range), p. 389 (probable mobility of side and covering plates in other types 

 as in the marginal ambulaoral leaflets); Trans. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), ser. 2, vol. 2, 1879, pp. 2, 29, 

 32 (history; structure; morphology; comparison with Actinomelra [Comasteridaej; bibliography), 

 pi. 1, fig. 1, pi. 4, figs. 12-17.— LuDWiQ, Mitt. Zool. Stat. Ncapel, vol. 1, 1879, p. 536 (detailed 

 synonymy; Palermo, Messina, Naples, Nice, Marseille; other localities given refer to adriatica 

 and bifida) ; Zool. Anz., vol. 2, 1879, p. 540 (anatomy) ; Mitt. Zool. Stat. Neapel, vol. 2, ISSO, 

 p. 53 (comparison with L. phalangium), pi. 4, fig. 2 (four calcareous rods from an ambul.acral 

 lappet of a pinnule at the distal end of an arm); Zool. Anz., vol. 3, 1880, p. 470 (structure of the 

 egg membrane); Zeitschr. wiss. Zool., vol. 34, 1880, p. 311 (stone canal; anatomy).— P. H. 

 Carpenter, Pop. Sci. Rev., vol. 4, No. 15, 1880, p. 200, pi. 5, fig. 1 (vertical section through 

 the body); Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 9, No. 4, 1881, p. 151 (1 of separate) (general aspect of 

 the Blake collection and comparisons); Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., new ser., vol. 21, 1881, p. 182 

 (minute anatomy; bibliography); Zool. Anz., vol. 4, 1881, p. 521 (difl'erontial characters).— Bell, 

 Proc. Zool. Soc London, 1882, p. 533 (listed), p. 534 (specific formula). — Marion, Ann. Mus. 



