410 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM 



vol. 9, No. 4, 1881, p. 166; Report Brit. Assoc, for 1881 (York), 1882, p. 672.— Chapman, Trans. 

 Roy. Soc. Canada, vol. 1, 1882, sect. 4, 1883, p. 115.— Packard, Zoology, 1886, p. 101.— 

 Norman, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist.,ser. 6, vol.7, No. 40, April 1891, pp. 386, 387 (discussion). — 

 Bather, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 7, 1891, p. 464. — Norman, Ann. and Mag. 

 Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 8, No. 44, Aug. 1891, pp. 180, 181. — Seeliger, Zool. Jahrb., Anat. u. 

 Ontog., vol. 6, 1892, p. 394. — Huxley, Anat. of Invert. Animals, 1901, p. 498. — A. H. Clark, 

 Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 33, 1908, p. 685 (restored to use with the type Asterias mulliradiala 

 Linn^; diagnosis and list of species); Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 21, 1908, p. 135 

 (referred to the Comasteridae) ; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 34, 1908, p. 211 (referred to the 

 Comasteridae) ; p. 212 (occurs in the West Indies and Japan); p. 506 (status; type Asierias 

 multiradiata Linn6) ; vol. 35, 1908, pp. 113, 114; fig. 24, p. 122 (arm structure); p. 123 (restric- 

 tion; diagnosis); p. 124 (list of species); pp. 126, 127 (arm structure); American Naturalist, 

 vol. 42, No. 500, 1908, p. 541 (characteristic of the Indo-Pacific-Japanese area) ; Geographical 

 Journal, vol. 32, No. 6, 1908, p. 602 (same); Smiths. Miscell. Coll., vol. 52, pt. 2, 1908, p. 204 

 (distinctive characters); p. 207 (compared with Comalella); Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 

 22, 1909, p. 87 (type determined as Comatula multiradiata Lamarck [not Asterias multiradiata 

 Lmn6] = Alecto multifida J. Miiller); Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 36, 1909, p. 362 (ambulacral 

 plating in the genus [that is, Nemaster] first shown by Springer; constant feature in all West 

 Indian species); p. 365 (mouth nearly or quite central); p. 506 (synonymy; genotype; distribu- 

 tion) ; Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 22, 1909, p. 173 (articulation in the IBr series a pseudo- 

 syzygy); p. 175 (referred to the Comasterinae) ; Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 39, 1911, p. 538 

 (articulation in IBr series); Memoirs Australian Mus., vol. 4, pt. 15, 1911, p. 711 (determina- 

 tion of the genotype); pp. 730, 732 (in key); p. 733 (key to the Australian species); p. 746 

 (original reference, characters, and range); Smiths. Miscell. Coll., vol. 60, No. 10, 1912, p. 6 

 (Actinometra belli referred to this genus); Crinoids of the Indian Ocean, 1912, p. 2 (a species 

 was included by Lamarck in his Comatula multiradiata); p. 9 (possesses additional species in 

 Australia); p. 11 (represented in the Ceylon region; this the western limit of the large and 

 highly multibrachiate species); p. 55 (in key); p. 83 (original reference; type); Smiths. Miscell. 

 Coll., vol. 65, No. 10, 1915, pp. 34 and following (phylogenetic study); American Naturalist, 

 vol. 49, 1915, p. 525 (bathymetric range); p. 539 (asymmetrical disk; 1 or more rays dwarfed); 

 Unstalked Crinoids of the Siboga Exped., 1918, p. 34 (in key; range) ; p. 35 (key ts the included 

 species). — Gislen, Nova Acta reg. Soc. sci. Upsaliensis, ser. 4, vol. 5, No. 6, 1922, p. 52 (pinnule 

 combs); p. 56 (discussion) ; Zool. Bidrag fr4n Uppsala, vol. 9, 1924, p. 35 (brachial homologies); 

 p. 84 (pseudosyzygies) ; p. 88 (articulations); p. 97 (pinnule articulations); p. 117 (relation to 

 fossils) . 



Phanogenia Lov^N, Ofversigt k. Vetensk.-Akad. Forhandl., 1866, No. 9, p. 231 (diagnosis; geno- 

 type Ph. typica). — Claus, Grundziige d. Zool., 1872, p. 229 (a recent type); p. 230 (listed); 

 1876, pp. 277, 279.— P. H. Carpenter, Nature, vol. 15, Jan. 4, 1877, p. 197; Journ. Linn. Soc. 

 (Zool.), vol. 13, 1877, p. 442. — Pascoe, Zool. Classification, 1877, p. 30. — Zittel, Handb. d. 

 Palaeontol., vol. 1, 1876-1880, p. 346 (referred to the Comatulidae) ; p. 397 (a recent type).— 

 P. H. Carpenter, Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci., new ser., vol. 18, 1878, p. 361 (basals); Proc. 

 Roy. S-c, vol. 28, 1879, p. 389; Trans. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), ser. 2, vol. 2, 1879, p. 16 (listed); 

 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, 1880, p. 40.— Claus, Traits de zool., 1884, p. 412.— von Graff, 

 Challenger Reports, Zoology, vol. 10, pt. 27, 18^4, p. 29.— de Loriol, Pal6ontol. frang., terrain 

 jurassique, vol. 11, pt. 2, 1889, p. 432. — Springer, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 25, Nd. 1, 

 1901, p. 51. — A. H. Clark, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 33, 1908, p. 685 (considered a synonym 

 of Comasler [as here usedj); vol. 35, 1908, fig. 20, p. 120 (arm structure), p. 123 (reinstated; 

 diagnosis); p. 124 (list of species); p. 127 (arm structure); American Naturalist, vol. 42, No. 

 500, 1908, p. 541 (characteristic of the Indo-Pacific-Japanese area); Geographical Journal, 

 vol. 32, No. 6, 1908, p. 602 (same); Smiths. Miscell. Coll., vol. 52, p. 2, 1908, p. 203 (redefined 

 and restricted); Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 22, 1909, p. 87 (as a generic name must be 

 supplanted by Comasler); Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 36, 1909, p. 365 (mouth nearly or 

 quite central). 



Actinometra (part) Ltjtken, Mus. Godeffroy Cat., vol. 5, 1879, pp. 386, 390, and following authors. 



