532 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM 



Lamarck's and Goldfuss' use of the name). — Allman, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1863, 

 p. 246 (from Goldfuss). — Qdenstedt, Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands, vol. 4, Asteriden u. 

 Encriniden, 1876, p. 165, pi. 96, fig. 19 (from Goldfuss). — P. H. Carpenter, Nature, vol. 15, 

 Jan. 4, 1877, p. 198 (of Goldfuss is a Comasler; of Lamarck is an Actinometra); Jouru. Linn. 

 Soc. (Zool.), vol. 13, 1877, p. 455 (discussion of Goldfuss); Trans. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), ser. 2, 

 vol. 2, 1879, p. 5 (of Lamarck; mouth excentric or even ma,Tg\nB\; = Caput- Medusae bruimum 

 Linck) ; p. 9 (renamed, on the basis of an examination of Lamarck's specimen by Trosohel, 

 muUifida by Muller); p. 16 (name miiUifida adopted by Dujardin for this type); Journ. Linn. 

 Soc. (Zool.), vol. IS, 1880, p. 188 (of Lamarck, made the type of Comasler by Agassiz; basals of 

 Goldfuss' specimen); Challenger Reports, Zoology, vol. 26, pt. 60, 1888, p. 323 (discussion of 

 the name). — Norman, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 7, 1891, p. 386 (type of Comasler). — 

 Bather, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 7, 1891, p. 464 (of Goldfuss; type of Goldfussia 

 Norman; of Lamarck; type of Comasler Agassiz; of doubtful identity). — Nohman, Ann. and 

 Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol 8, No. 44, Aug. 1891, p. 181. — A. H. Ci-ark, Bull, du mus. d'hist. 

 nat., Paris, 1911, No. 4, p. 244 (of Lamarck is Capillaster sentosa + Comasler mullifida+ Coman- 

 thus bennetii); p. 247 (history of the name as applied by Linn^, Lamarck, and Goldfuss); 

 Memoirs Australian Mus., vol. 4, pt. 15, 1911, p. 711 (history of the name as applied by Lamarck 

 and Goldfuss); Crinoids of the Indian Ocean, 1912, p. 2 (identity of Goldfuss' specimen). 



Comasler mulliradiaius L. Agassiz, M6m. soc. de sci. nat. Neuchiltel, vol. 1, 1835, 1836, p. 193 

 (part). — voN Meyer, Mus. Senckenb., vol. 2, 1837, pi. 16, fig. 10 (arm).— Gistel, Naturgesch. 

 des Thierreichs, 1848, p. 176 (listed). — Dujardin and Hup6, Hist. nat. des zoophytes, Echino- 

 dermes, 1862, p. 212 (synonymy; Indian Seas; from Goldfuss). — de Loriol, Palfiontol. frauQ., 

 ter. jurassique, vol. 11, pt. 2, 1889, p. 437 (after Agassiz). — -Norman, Ann. and Mag. Nat. 

 Hist., ser. 6, vol. 7, 1891, p. 387 (type of Comasler). 



Aleclo hennelli J. MOller, Monatsber. d. k. preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., 1841, p. 187 (description; 

 locality unknown); Archiv f. Naturgesch., 1841, vol. 1, p. 146 (same); Abhandl. d. k. preuss. 

 Akad. d. Wiss., 1841, 1843, p. 216 (structure). — A. H. Clark, Notes from the Leyden Mus., 

 vol. 33, 1911, p. 176 (identity). 



Comalula (Aleclo) mulliradiata (part) J. MOller, Abhandl. d. k. preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., 1847, 

 1849, p. 261 (part of name, from Lamarck; not description). 



Comalula hennelli 3. MtJLLER, Abhandl. d.k. preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., 1847, 1849, p. 264 (redescribed). — 

 Dujardin and Hup£, Hist. nat. des zoophytes, Echinod&rmes, 1862, p. 208 (synonymy; 

 description; locality unknown). — P. H. Carpenter, Trans. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), ser. 2, vol. 2, 

 1879, p. 10 {Comasler mulliradiaius of Goldfuss identified as this species by Muller). — A. H. 

 Clark, Crinoids of the Indian Ocean, 1912, p. 31 (identity).- — Troschel and Ruthb, Handb. 

 d. Zool., 1859, p. 584 (from Muller). 



Actinometra mulliradiala (part) Dujardin and Hup£, Hist. nat. des zoophytes, Echinod^nnes, 

 1862, p. 210 (from Miiller).— Nobman, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. 7, 1891, p. 387 

 (type of Comasler). 



Comalula multifida (part) Dujardin and Hupe, Hist. nat. des zoophytes, Echinodermes, 1862, 

 p. 207 (possibly specimen with 50 arms). 



Actinometra hennelli Bolsche, Archiv f. Naturgesch., 1866, vol. 1, p. 90 (Schiffer [Loyalty] Is.). — 

 Claus, Grundzuge d. Zool., 1872, p. 230 (example of the genus); 1876, p. 279 (same).— P. H. 

 Carpenter, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), vol. 13, 1877, p. 450. — Ludwig. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool., 

 vol. 28, 1877, pp. 255 and following (anatomy). — P. H. Carpenter, Trans. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 

 ser. 2, vol. 2, 1879, p. 27 (systematic position) ; p. 29 (more than 70 arms; type of arm division) ; 

 Notes from the Leyden Mus., vol. 3, 1881, p. 212 (redescribed). — Bell, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 

 1882, p. 533 (listed); p. 535 (specific formula). — P. H. Carpenter, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 

 vol. 16, 1882, pp. 521, 523, 526 (history; redescription; Singapore); Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 

 1882, 1883, pp. 732 and following (discussion of Bell's method of formulation and corrected 

 formula). — Claus, Traits de zool., 1884, p. 412 (after Miiller). — von Graff, Challenger 

 Reports, Zoology, vol. 20, pt. 61, 1887, pp. 5, 7, 11 (Moluccas; myzostomes).— P. H. Carpen- 

 ter, Challenger Reports, Zoology, vol. 26, pt. 60, 1888, pp. 59, 61, 329, 331, 348, 366, 382 

 (Loyalty Is.; Pelew Is.; Sooloo Sea; Singapore). — Hartlaub, Nova Acta Acad. German. 



