CHECKLIST OF THE AMPHIBU OF MEXICO 63 



ELEUTHEKODACTYLUS SALTATOK Taylor 



Eleutherodaciylus saltator Taylor, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 54 1941 

 pp; 89-91; Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., vol. 27, 1941, p. 117, pi. 4, fig' 2. 



Type.— EKT-RMS No. 24301. 

 Type locality. — Omilteme, Guerrero, Mexico. 



Range.— Known only from the type locality. Probably distributed 

 through the higher parts of the Sierra Madre del Sur. 



ELEUTHERODACTYLUS LATICEPS (Dum6ril) 



Hylodes laticeps Dum^ril, Ann. Sci. Nat. Paris, ser. 3, zool., vol. 19, 1853, p. 



178. — DuMf RiL, BiBRON, and Dum^ril, Erp6tologie g6n6rale, vol. 9, 1854, 



p. 408, Atlas, pi. 99, figs. 1-4. 

 Eleutherodaciylus laticeps Kellogg, U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 160, 1932, pp. 93, 



106-107. 



Type.—Mns. Hist. Nat. Paris No. 509 (No. 1547). 

 Type locality. — Yucatdn, Mexico. 

 Range. — Known only from type locality. 



ELEUTHERODACTYLUS CACTORUM Taylor 



Eleutherodactylus cactorum Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., vol. 25, 1938 (1939), 

 pp. 391-394, text fig. 2. 



Type.—EJIT-JIMS No. 6383. 



Type locality. — Kilometer 226, 20 miles northwest of Tehuacdn, 

 Puebla, Mexico. 

 Range. — Eastern Puebla (Upper Balsan Province) . 



ELEUTHERODACTYLUS LATRANS (Cope) 



Lithodytes latrans Cope, U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 17, 1880, p. 25; U. S. Nat. Mus. 



Bull. 34, 1889, pp. 316-317, fig. 80. 

 Eleutherodactylus latrans Stejneger and Barbour, Checklist of North American 



amphibians and reptiles, ed. 1, 1917, p. 34. 



Type—.? (Cotypes) U.S.N.M. Nos. 10058, 10529, 10751-53. 



Type locality. — Helotes, Bexar County, Tex. 



Range. — Texas; northern Mexico to San Luis Potosi. Known hi 

 Mexico from 10 miles west of Naranjos, San Luis Potosi (EHT-HMS 

 Collection), and Cuatro Ci^negas, Coahuila. 



ELEUTHERODACTYLUS AUGUSTI (Dugfee) 



Hylodes augusti Dug^s, in Brocchi, Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, ser. 7, vol. 3, 1879, 



pp. 21-22. 

 Eleutherodactylus augusti Kellogg, U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 106, 1932, pp. 93-94, 



100-104.— Smith and Necker, Anal. Esc. Nac. Cienc. Biol., vol. 3, 1944, 



pp. 201-203, pi. 1, fig. 1.— Taylor and Smith, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 95. 



1945, pp. 574-575, pi. 24, figs. 7, 8. 



