90 BULLETIN 194, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM 



Type.— (Coty pes) Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nos. 1901.12.19.86 and 

 1901.12.19.87. 



Type locality. — Jalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. 

 Range. — Known only from the type locality.^^ 



HYLA BROMEUANA Taylor «« 



Hyla bromeliana Taylor, Copeia, July 12, 1939, pp. 98-100, fig. 1. 



Type.— ERT-HMS No. 16630. 



Type locality. — Near Tianguistengo, Hidalgo, Mexico. 



Range. — Known only from type locality. 



HYLA HAZELAE Taylor 



Hyla hazelae Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., vol, 26, 1939 (1940), pp. 385-389, 

 figs. 1, 2. 



TVpe.— EHT-HMS No. 16263. 



Type locality. — Cerro San Felipe, 10 miles northeast of Oaxaca, 

 Oaxaca, Mexico. 



Range. — Known from the type locality only. 



HTLA SMARAGDINA Taylor 



Hyla smaragdina Taylor, Copeia, Mar. 30, 1940, pp. 18-20, fig. 1. 



Type.—ERT-RM^ No. 17534. 



Type locality. — Mountains at eastern end of Lake Chapala, 6 

 kilometers east of Cojumatlan, Michoacdn, Alexico. 

 Range. — Known only from type locality. 



HYLA MIOTYMPANUM Cope 



Hyla mioiympamim Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 15, 1863, 



p. 47.— Kellogg, U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 160, 1932, pp. 155-156, 170-172, 



fig. 19d. 

 Hyla microtis Peters, Monatsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1869, pp. 880-881 (probably 



Matamoros, Puebla; Berl. Mus. No. 6657, two cotypes). 

 Hyla godmani GtJNTHER, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Reptilia and Batrachia, 



1901, pp. 275-276, pi. 72, fig. e (Misantla and Jalapa, Veracruz; Brit, Mus. 



Nos. 1901.12.19.88-96).'»<' 



Type.— Cotypes, U.S.N.M. No. 6311 (now lost). 



Type locality. — Near Jalapa and Mirador, Veracruz, Mexico. 



Range. — Central Nuevo Le6n to Oaxaca and (?) Chiapas. Vera- 



'8 A specimen reported from Morelos, Guatemala, by Atkinson, Ohio Nat., vol. 7, 1907, p. 152, doubtlessly 

 belongs to another sperics. 



*• There is a possibility that this species is the same as Hyla (aeniopus Cope. Dunn, however, who ex- 

 amined the types of that species, reported that he did not believe they were Hyla baudinii but that it was 

 difficult to decide. Since Hyla bromeliana shows not the slightest resemblance to Hyla bajidinii, the proba- 

 bility of its synonymy with taentcpus is remote. 



« Except for the testimony of E. R. Dunn and R. Kellogg (U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 160. 1932, pp. 170-171), 

 we would regard H. godmani as a good species with H. rickardsi a synonym. 



