Figure 14. — Tobacco-pipe profiles. Same size. 



period. Letters "RM" molded on either side ot 

 the heel. Stem-hole diameter 6 / 6i in. T.N. 30. 



4. Bowl with neither heel nor spur, bul the angle of 

 the howl comparable to that of no. 2. No mark. 

 Stem-hole diameter % t in. T.N. 31. 



5. Bowl apparently similar to no. 3, but with the lip 

 missing; smaller heel with molded initials "IIS." 

 but the letters poorly formed and almost illegible. 

 Stem-hole diameter % t in. T.N. 1. 



6. Bowl slightly fatter than the above, initials "IS" 

 clearly molded on the small heel, the "I" very thick. 

 Stem-hole diameter % t in. T.N. 17. 



7. Bowl with neither heel nor spur, an evolved 18th- 



century form in the style of no. 6 but somewhat 

 larger. This is clearly a later variation of no. 4.' 1 

 Stem-hole diameter b i t in. T.N. 19. 

 8. Base of bowl and stem fragment, of red clay and of 

 local Virginia manufacture. 7 -' Apparently a 17th- 

 century form, but found here in an 18th-century 

 context. Stem-hole diameter 10 64 in. T.N. 18. 



Noel Hume, "Excavations .it Rosewell," p. 220, foot- 

 note 96. 



•2 See J. C. Harrington, "Tobacco Pipes from Jamestown," 

 Quarterly Bulletin Arckeological Society of I'iiginia (June 1951), 

 vol. 5, no. 4, no pagination. 



PAPER 5 3 : EXCAVATIONS AT TUTTER S NECK 



57 



