Artijact 

 Shnds of heavy load-glass drcantcr and 

 knop of lan»e wini-glass or pcdcslal-bowi 

 ^tcm. (LSNM 60.149) 



Wcstt-nvald stoneware. (USNM 60.104; 

 60.1U1) 



lidcwatcr-lype earthenware. (l S\.\I 

 60.141; 60.154) 



Iron gate pintle. (l'.S.\.\l bU.yU; l^s. J'J 

 and 88) 



Brass harness ring. (LSNM 60.33; figs. 

 29 and 83i) 



Bridle bit. (U.SNM 60.67; figs. 29 and 

 91c) 



Bottle seal, marked with "i'. M" and 

 first three digits of dale "173. . . ." 

 (L'SNM 60.68) 



Fragment of iron potlid (LSNM 60.69; 

 Kg. 87a) 



Indian celt, with hole drilled for use as 

 pendant. (USNM 60.87) 



Iron loop fidin swinclein e. (I'.SNM 

 60.86) 



\\ inc-lxitlle base. Diameter 4'j inches 

 L'SNM 60.83) 



Iron plow colter. (LSNM 60.88. ill. 79) 



Dale 



(if Manufmluie 



ca. I7'i0 



before 1750 



(See matching seal dated 1737 on 

 wine bottle, LS.NM 59.1688; 

 fig. 78; ill. 37) 



1735-1750 



Irenchc* bnidc \N.ii 



.Surface 



Wall I 



.soiit: 



Juil, in bricks in (rcond 



2 im • 

 of 1 1 

 undisturbed wii 



5 inches west of Wall K gai^ 

 course, 4 inches above undisti:...: ,. 



L'nderncath bridle bit (sec above). 



Southwest comer of Wall E gair\«a>. 7 

 inches above undisturbed soil, at lowest 

 brick course. 



16 inches east of southwest comn ■■ i 

 Wall E gateway, at undisturbed soil, 

 7 inches below wall base. 



30 inches east of southwest comer ■ I 

 NVall E gateway, at undisturbed M>il, 

 7 inches below wall base. 



Wall E gateway. Top course of bricks, 

 16 inches north of pintle (see abovrt. 



Wall E gateway. I 

 3.5 feet ea>t of pin:.. 



III addition to the artifacts listed above nimu-rous 

 uther.s were excavated from the trenches, although 

 few of these have aicheological value for purposes of 

 analyzing the structures. (July the finds accompanied 

 by depth and provenience data are significant in 

 evaluating these structures, and in the case of the 

 gateway few are helpful to any degree. The frag- 

 mcntaiy holtle seal found there in.it. ' r tl\ n 



whole .seal th.it occurs on a wine hoii- "'d in 



a subsequent section. That seal is dated 17.17, and 

 thus this seal must ha\e been simil.irlv d.ited. Its 

 presence near the lowest level suggests th.il the wall 

 was in construction at the lime the seal w.is deposited. 



Bottles were used for a long time, howcv< 



seal may have reached it ' ■ ' ■ ■ •' 



later than 1737. The Inti 



the (opsoil while the tirnch in which 



Ixtilt was lieing excavated. I ' 



next to it probably w.ts left the 



tion. The colter, although it 



Iflth-eentiiry origin, mav '• ■• 



the llllh cenliirv after th. 



Since the cf! 



top of the 111.... .V .. . 



