442 ANNUAL REPORT SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, 192 8 



(1) 



The deposits in which the remains were found are of Pliocene age 

 (Moir). 



The deposits in which the remains were found are of Pleistocene 

 age (Dawkins, Freudenberg and others). 



(2) 



The fact that the remains were found in stream-deposited material 

 counts against the reference of all to the same individual (Miller, 

 Ramstrom). 



The fact that the remains were found in stream-deposited mate- 

 rial does not count against the reference of all to the same individual 

 (Jaekel, Keith, Pycraft, Woodward, and others). 



(3) 



The fragments all pertain to one creature, a man (Broom, Keith, 

 Pycraft, Smith, Underwood, Woodward, and others). 



The fragments pertain to two creatures — the skull to a man, the 

 jaw and teeth to an ape (Miller, liamstrom, Waterston, and others). 



The fragments pertain to two creatures — the skull and jaw to a 

 man, tlie canine tooth to an ape (Lyne). 



The fragments pertain to two individuals, each a particular kind 

 of man (Hrdlicka, Puccioni). 



(4) 



The canine is a permanent tooth (Woodward and most writers). 

 The canine is a milk tooth (Lyne). 



(5) 



The degree of wear of the canine tooth is too great for the tooth 

 to have been a milk tooth (Underwood). 



The degree of wear of the canine tooth is not too great for the 

 tooth to have been a milk tooth (Hopson). 



(6) 



The canine tooth came from the upper jaw and is most like the 

 jDermanent upper canine of a female chimpanzee (Miller). 



The canine tooth came from the lower jaw and is most like the 

 lower milk canine of men and great apes (Woodward). 



