"MISSING LINKS" — MILLER 443 



(T) 



The left lower molar pertaining to the third set of fragments 

 is worn in the same manner and to the same degree as the correspond- 

 ing tooth in the original jaw (Hrdlicka). 



The left lower molar pertaining to the third set of fragments is 

 worn in a different manner from the corresj)onding right tooth in the 

 original jaw (Woodwai'd). 



The left lower molar pertaining to the third set of fragments is 

 not worn at all (thus differing conspicuously from the worn corre- 

 sponding tooth in the original jaw) (Osborn). 



(8) 



The specimens pertaining to the third set of fragments give addi- 

 tional support to the belief that the association of the jaw with 

 the skull is justified (Gregory, Hellman, Osborn, Woodward). 



The specimens pertaining to the third set of fragments give 710 

 additional support to the belief that the association of the jaw with 

 the skull is justified (Hrdlicka). 



(9) 



The jaw is straight like that of an ape (Woodward and most 

 other writers). 



The jaw is horseshoe-shaped like that of a man (Kleinschmidt). 



(10) 



The jaw more nearlj'^ resembles that of the Kaffir than that of the 

 chimpanzee (Pycraft with approval of Broom, Keith and others). 



The jaw more nearly resembles that of the chimpanzee than that 

 of the Kaffir or any other race of man (Miller and many other 

 writers) . 



(11) 



The jaw was chinless (Woodward and most writers). 

 The jaw may not have been completely chinless (Dixon). 



(12) 



The jaw appears to be almost precisely that of an ape (Wood- 

 ward ) . 



The jaw is that of a chimpanzee (Boule, Miller, Ramstrom). 



The jaw is utterly unlike that of any chimpanzee (O'Donoghue). 



The jaw has many characters which make it human in spite of the 

 fact that it presents many points of likeness to that of a chimpanzee 



