444 ANNUAL REPORT SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, 192 8 



(Pycraft, with approval of Broom, Keith, Smith, Underwood, and 

 Woodward). 



The jaw is more like that of Neanderthal man than chimpanzee 

 (Puccioni). 



The jaw is oranglike (Frassetto). 



The jaw is essentially a human jaw (Broom), 



(13) 



The molar teeth in the jaw^ are .simian and within the variation 

 limits for the corresponding teeth of great apes (Miller, Eamstrom, 

 and others). 



The molar teeth in the jaw differ conspicuously from those of all 

 the great apes (Pycraft). 



The molar teeth in the jaw are definitely those of a chimpanzee 

 (Miller, Ramstrom, and others). 



The molar teotli in the jaw are as unlike chimpanzee teeth as 

 teeth can well be (Keith). 



The molar teeth in tlie jaw find their nearest analogy in the teeth 

 of the extinct apes of the genus Dryopithcrus (Hrdlicka). 



The molar teeth in the jaw are human (Pj^craft, Smith, and 

 others). 



(14) 



The molar teeth in the jaw are ground down by a transverse 

 movement which is physically impossible for any chimpanzee to 

 accomplish (Broom ) . 



The molar teeth in the jaw arc ground down in the same manner 

 as in a chimpanzee in the United States National Museum (Miller, 

 Pycraft, 1918). 



(15) 



Taking the jaw and its teeth together the characters are nearest 

 those of a young orang (Frassetto). 



Taking the jaw and its teeth together the characters are nearest 

 those of a chimpanzee (Miller, Ramstrom, and others). 



(16) 



The chimpanzee represented by the jaw was different from the 

 living African species (Miller). 



The chimpanzee represented by the jaw can not be distinguished 

 from living African sjjecies (Ramstrom). 



(IT) 



The presence of a hitherto unknown ape in England in the 

 Pleistocene period involves an upheaval of paleontological teaching 

 (Smith). 



