"MISSING LINKS" — MILIAR 459 



*GnjFFEiDA-RuGGEEi, V. La couti'oversia sul fossile di Piltdown e I'origine del 



philum umano. Monitore Zool. Ital., vol. 30, pp. 7-18. 1919. 

 Grexjoky, William King. The Dawn Man of Piltdown, England. Am. MUkS. 



Journal, vol. 14, pp. 189-200, figs. I-II. May, 1914. 

 Gregory, William King. Studies on the Evolution of the Primates, parts 1 



and 2. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, pp. 239-355. June 16, 191G. 

 Geegoey, William King. Note on the Molar Teeth of the Piltdown Mandible. 



Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. 18, pp. 384-387, fig. 47. July-September, 1916. 

 ♦Gregory, William King, and Heixman, Milo. The Crown Patterns of Fossil 



and Recent Human Molar Teeth and Their Meaning. Nat. Hist., vol. 26, pp. 



300-309, figs. 1-9, May-June, 1926. 



Photographs of Piltdown jaw and teeth, figs. 5, G. Jaw accepted as 

 human. Of the teeth it is remarked that " the crown pattern of the Pilt- 

 down molars ... is identical with that of all the known species of 

 extinct apes named Dryopithecus and allied genera from the Miocene of 

 Europe and India" (p. 305). 



^HoLLisTER, N. International Zoology and the International Code. Science, n. s., 

 vol. 48, pp. 12-13. July 5, 1918. 



Discussion of the Piltdown jaw shows that authors who do not follow 

 the International Code use no less than three generic names for the chim- 

 panzees. 



HooTON, E. A. The Evolution of the Human Face and its relation to Head 

 Form. Dental Cosmos, vol. 58, pp. 272^281. March, 1916. 



Piltdown skull (pp. 277-278) accepted as " . , . an entirely human 

 braincase . . . and paradoxically enough associated with it a long, 

 narrow, and very simian jaw." 



HrdliCka, a. The Most Ancient Skeletal Remains of Man. Ann. Rep. Smiths. 



Inst., 1913, pp. 491-552. 1914 ; Eoanthropus, pp. 501-509, pis. 5-8. 

 *Hrdlicka, a. The Piltdown Jaw. Amer. Journ. Phys. Anthrop., vol. 5, pp. 



337-347. December, 1922. 

 "Hrdlicka, a. Dimensions of the First and Second Lower Molars with their 



Bearing on the Piltdown Jaw and on Man's Phylogeny. Journ. Phys. 



Anthrop., vol. 6, pp. 195-216. May, 1923. 

 *Huntek, John I. New Light on the Controversy of the Piltdown Jaw and 



Cranium, pp. 1-11. 1924? Separate from? (Summary of address given 



before the Soc. Dent. Sci. N. S. W.) 

 *JiJON, J. y Caamano. The Piltdown Jaw. Bol. Soc. Ecuatoriaua Bstud. Hist. 



Amer., Quito, vol. 1, pp. 184-185. September, 1918. 



Johnston, H. H. [Review of Osborn's Men of the Old Stone Age.] The Geo- 

 graphical Journal, vol. 48, pp. 349-350. October, 1916. 



Remarks that the author "... seems ... to be a little perverse in 

 quoting the absurd suggestion . . . that the Piltdown jaw and teeth do 

 not belong to the Piltdown calvarium. ..." 



Keith, A. Ape Man or Modern Man? The Two Piltdown Skull Reconstruc- 

 tions. Illustrated London News, vol. 143, p. 245, figs. 1-6. Aug. 16, 1913. 



Keith, A. [Discussion of new reconstruction of skull of Eoanthropus.'^ Abstr. 

 Proc. Geol. Soc. London, session 1913-14, p. 30. Dec. 31, 1913. (See also 

 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 70, p. 98, Apr. 25, 1914.) 



Keith, A. The Significance of the Discovery at Piltdown. Bedrock, vol. 2, pp. 

 435-453, figs. 1-3. January, 1914. 



Keith, A. The Reconstruction of Fossil Human Skulls. Journ. Royal Anthrop. 

 Inst. Gt. Brit, and Ireland, vol. 44 pp. 12^31, figs. 1-16. January-June, 1914. 



