460 ANNUAL REPORT SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, 1928 



Keith, A. The Antiquity of Mau. New Edition, 1925. 



Eoanthropus, pp. 4S8-709. 

 *Kleinschmidt, O. Realgattmig i/o»iO Sapiens (L.) Eiue naturgoseb. Monogr. 

 des Meusclien. Berajah, Zoogr. infiuita, 1922, pp. 1-30. 



Homo sapiens daxcsoni (pp. 7-9). The cast of tlie inaudible clearly shows 

 the horseshoe-shaped form of the human jaw (p. 8). 

 Lankestee, Ray. [Discussion of the Piltdowu Skull.] Abstr. Proc. Geol. 

 Soc. London, session 1912-13, pp. 22-23. Dec. 28, 1912. (See also Quart. 

 Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 69, pp. 147-148. March, 1913. Issued Apr. 

 25, 1913.) 

 Lankestek, Ray. The Missing Link. Diversions of a Naturalist, ch. 30 (pp. 

 275-291), figs. 24-30 (mostly after Woodward); preface dated June 16, 

 1915. (Previously published in London Telegraph.) 



" The Piltdown jaw is the most startling and significant fossil bone that 

 has ever been brought to light . . . because this jaw and the incomplete 

 skull found witli it really and in simple fact furnish a link — a form inter- 

 mediate between the man and the ape" (p. 284). 



*Lenoik, Eenest-Roeert. L'Homme et le gibbon. Rev. Anthrop., vol. 36, pp. 



427-460. December, 1926. 

 *LuLL, Richakd Swan. Organic Evolution, a Text-Book, pp. I-XVIII, 1-729, 



pis. I-XXX, figs. 1-253. New York, 1917. 



Piltdown man, pp. 681-682. Accepts dissociation of jaw from skull. 

 Uses name Homo dawsoni for former (fig. 251) and Pan vetus for latter 

 (fig. 248). 

 Lyne, W. Courtney. The Significance of the Radiographs of the Piltdown 

 Teeth. Proc. Roy. Soc. Medicine, London, vol. 9, Odont., pp. 33-51, 60-61, 

 figs. 1-7. February, 1916. 

 Matthew, W. D. Recent Progress in Vertebrate Paleontology. Science, n. s. 

 vol. 43, pp. 103-110 (with Eastman, C. R., and Gregory, W. K.). Jan. 21, 

 1916. 

 Matthew, W. D. Note on the Association of the Piltdown Skull and Jaw. 

 Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, pp. 348-350, June 16, 1916. 



" But the argument from association is quite too slight to outweigh 

 any . . . contrary evidence, and certainly not adequate to base on it the 

 erection of a new type of primate combining characters hitherto found dis- 

 sociated in district generic types" (p. 350). (See Smith, May 25, 1916, 

 and Woodward, February, 1916.) 



MiLLEB, Gerrit S., Jr. The jaw of the Piltdown man. Smithsonian Misc. 



Coll., vol. 65, No. 12, pp. 1-31, pis. 1-5. Nov. 24, 1915. 

 Miller, Gerrit S., Jr. The Piltdown jaw. Amer. Journ. Phys. Anthrop., vol. 



1 (January-March. 1918), pp. 25-52, pis. 1-4. July 9, 1918. 

 MoiR, J. Reid. Pre-Palaeolithic Man in England. Science Progress, vol. 12, pp. 



465-474, January, 1918. 



Piltdown individual, pp. 470-^74. " Thus we find in this unique fossil a 

 combination of human [cranial] and simian [mandibular] characters, such 

 as have been looked for by evolutionists ever since Darwin first enunciated 

 his famous theory regarding the ancestry of modern man" (p. 470). 



*MoLLisoN, Th. Die Abstammung des Meuschen. Die Naturwissenschaften, 

 vol. 9, pp. 128-140. Feb. 25, 1921. 



Eoanthropus, p. 137-138. Skull and jaw do not belong together. 



