"MISSING LINKS" MILLER 461 



* MoLLisoN, Th. Neuere Funde unci Untersuchungen fossiler Meiiscbenaf- 

 fen unci Mensclien. Zeitschrift fiir die gesammte Anatomie, Abt. 3, Ergebii. 

 der Anat. u. Entwicklungsgesch. vol. 25, pp. 69&-771. 1924. 



Eoanthropus, pp. 715-724. Reviews (imperfectly) literature to date, and 

 concludes that jaw and skull do not belong together and tbat a cbimpanzee- 

 like animal might have lived in Europe during one of the interglacial 

 periods. 



* O'DOKOGHUE, C. H. [Review of Tull [=Lull], Organic Evolution.] Science 

 Progress, vol. 13, pp. 162-1G3. July, 1918. 



"[The Piltdown jaw] is utterly unlike that of any chimpanzee, as a 

 brief examination of the actual specimen will show. If the jaw does not 

 belong with the skull . . . we have a jaw of an entirely new genus of 

 anthropoids" (p. 162). 



OsBOBN, Henry Fairfield. Men of the Old Stone Age, pp. I-XXVI. 1-545, pis. 8, 

 text figs. 268. November, 1915. 



Eoanthropua, pp. 130-144. The Piltdown race represents a side branch 

 of tlie human family wliich has left no descendants at all (p. 144). 



OsBORN, Henkt Fairfield. Review of the Pleistocene of Europe, Asia, and 

 Northern Africa. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., vol. 20, pp. 215-315. July 31, 

 1915. 

 OsBOBN, Henry Fairfield. Men of the Old Stone Age, 2d edition. February, 

 1916. 



Eoanthropua, pp. 130-144, 512. Accepts the conclusion tliat the jaw is 

 that of a chimpanzee. 



* OsBORN, Henry Fairfield. The Dawn Man of Piltdown, Sussex. Natural 

 History, vol. 21, pp. 577-590, figs. 1-15. February, 1922. 



Returns to tlie view that the jaw is human. 



* OscoRN, H. F., and Gregory, W. K. The Dawn Man (an authorized interview). 



McClure's Magazine, vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 19-28. March, 1923. 

 Pilgrim, Guy E. New Siwalik Primates and Their Bearing on the Evolution of 

 Man and the Antlu'opoidea. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. 45, pp. 1-74, pis. 

 1-4, figs. 1-2. 



Accepts association of skull witli jaw and places Eoanthropus on line 

 leading to Homo neanderthalcnsis. (See Keith, 1915, and Sutcliffe.) 



* Pilgrim, Guy E. A Sivapitkccns Palate and Other Primate Fossils from 

 India. Palaeont. Indica, n. s., vol. 14, pp. 1-24, pi. 1. 1927. 



It would appear that the symphysis of both Eomithropus and the Heidel- 

 berg jaw are in some ways intermediate between the Haritalyanger jaw 

 [Sivapithecus himalayetisis Pilgrim] and that of the chimpanzee. 



PucciONi, Nello. Appunti intorno al frammento mandibolare fossile di Pilt- 

 down (Sussex). Archivio per I'Antropologia e la Etnologia, vol. 43, pp. 

 167-175. 1913. 



Pycbaft, W. p. Ape Man or Modern Man? The Two Piltdown Skull Recon- 

 structions. The Case for Dr. A. Smith Woodward's Reconstruction. Illus- 

 trated London News, vol. 143, p. 282. Aug. 23, 1913. Four figures. 



Pycraft, W. p. The Jaw of the Piltdown Man — a Reply to Mr. Gerrit S. 

 Miller. Science Progress, vol. 11, pp. 389-409, figs. 1-4. January, 1917. 



♦Pycraft, W. P. Discussion [of paper by Woodward]. Quart. Journ. Geol. 

 Soc. London, vol. 73, p. 9. Apr. 6, 1918. 



* Ramstrom, Martin. Om underkiiken i Piltdown fyndet (" Eo-anthropus "). 



Svenska LakaresJillskapets Handlingar, vol. 42 (1916), pp. 1223-1256, figs. 

 1-6. (German synopsis, pp. 1255-6.) 



