ANTHROPOLOGY. 655 



fecting of these has kept pace with the improvement of each subject of 

 inquiry. Indeed, the great difference of opinion among the French and 

 the German craniologists is not so much respecting the imjiortauce of 

 certain parts as it is with reference to instrumentation. 



One of the most useful aids to progress is co-operation and division 

 of labor. This is effected by societies and their publications. Indeed, 

 it may be safely said that this subject is sufficiently appreciated, and 

 the continuation of the present activity of harmoniously cooperating 

 societies will bring together a mass of well-conducted observations of 

 the highest importance. It is contemplated to organize an international 

 bureau of anthropological bibliography. This will be a work of the 

 highest usefulness, for which this and other summaries, the incomplete 

 efforts of individuals, are only the preparation. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ANTHROPOLOGY FOR 1882. 

 I. — Antheopogeny. 



Allen, Grant. — Who was primitive man? Fortnightly, Sept.; Pop. Sc. Monthly, 



Nov. 

 Bastian, C. — Des sensations et de I'intelligence chez les animanx. Rev. scientifique, 



Paris, 1881, ii, 60&-619. 

 Cope, E. D. — The equivalents of consciousness. Am. Naturalist, March, 224-226. 

 Daewin and Development. — See Catalogue of Surgeon-General's Library, sub vocas. 

 Gegenbaxje, C. — Critical remarks on polj^dactyly as atavism.' [Morphol. Jahrb., vi, 



584.] J. Anat. Physiol., Lond., xvii, pp. 615-622. 

 HovELACQUE, A. — Lesdebuts de I'humanit^. L'hommeprimitif contemporain. Paris, 



Doin. Bvo. 

 Lacassagne, a. — Criminality in animals. Rev. scientifique, Paris, xxix, pp. 32-42; 



Pop. Sc. Month., Dec. 

 MacDonald, Geoege. — A sketch of individual development. Brit. Quarterly Rev., 



Jan. 

 Oenithophilos. — Philosophic ethnographique, comme quoi I'homme ne descend pas 



du singe, mais de I'oiseau. Paris. Bvo. 

 Pettigeew, J. B. — On man's place in creation, his education and development from a 



science point of view. Brit. Med. J. , Lond. , ii, 925-927. 

 Reid, H. a. — Man's zoogenetic lineage. Kansas City Rev., July. 

 Vincent, E. — Persistence of the central bone in the human hand. Reviewed by H. E. 



Sauvage in connection with M. Cornevin's "ies ancetres du cheval." Rev. d'an- 



throp., s6r. 2, v, pp. 103-110. 

 Wagnee, M. — De la formation des especes par la segregation. Rev. internat. d. sc 



biol., Paris, ix, pp. 9-32. 

 Wilson, A. — Chapters on evolution: A popular history of Darwinism and allied theo- 

 ries of development. N. Y. Bvo. 



II. — AECH.EOLOGY. 



Abbott, C. C. — Traces of a pre-Indian people. Pop. Sc. Month., Jan. 



Ayme, Louis, U. S. A. — Notes on Milta, Oaxaca, Mex., with plan and measurements of 



the ruins. Am. Antiquarian Soc. 

 Ayees, W. O. — The ancient man of Calaveras. Am. Naturalist, Nov. 

 Baldwin, Coenelius C- — Ancient burial cists in Northeastern Ohio. West. Res. & 



N. Ohio Hist. Soc., No. 56. 



